Game 19: Michigan at Michigan State Preview

Dylan Burkhardt
on
Basics
Who: No. 22 Michigan (14-4, 6-0 B1G) at No. 3 Michigan State (18-1, 7-0 B1G) 5525_michigan_state_spartans-alternate-1987[1]
Where: Breslin Center (East Lansing, MI)
When: 7:05 p.m., Wednesday, January 22nd, 2014
TV: ESPN
Radio: MGoBlue, 950 AM, 102.9 FM, 91 Sirius/XM
More: First Look, Video, Debacle

Michigan and Michigan State battle for first place tonight, marking the first time that the in-state rivals have faced off with undefeated Big Ten records of 6-0 or better. (EDIT: The first time any two Big Ten teams have faced off with 6-0 or better records)

The Spartans have sat in the top ten all season, dropping just one game. Michigan started in the top ten, but fell all the way out of the top 25. Now, without Mitch McGary, the Wolverines are climbing again. Winners of their last eight games, they are peaking at the right time to make a run at the conference title after victories at Wisconsin and against Iowa.

Michigan State is the odds on favorite to win the conference, but will be without Branden Dawson – who broke his hand punching a table – and potentially Adreian Payne – who has been sidelined with a foot sprain.

The Breslin Center has been unforgiving to the Wolverines. Michigan has just one win in East Lansing since 1997, a memorable upset on January 27th, 2011 that seemed to change the course of its program. Last year the Wolverines traveled to East Lansing with a top ten team and suffered their most lopsided loss of the season – a 23 point defeat.

Keith Appling Michigan State v Illinois snU1E-tfw1bl[1]

The Spartans

Michigan State’s offense is ranked 26th nationally in adjusted efficiency and the Spartans are scoring 1.09 points per Big Ten possession – fifth in the conference. Michigan State shoots a few more threes than the average Izzo team, with 33 percent of its attempts from beyond the arc, and is quite accurate as well. The Spartans are shooting a league-leading 39% from 3-point range in Big Ten play compared to just 48% (6th) on 2-point field goals. The Spartans don’t have massive turnover issues, giving the ball away on 17.5% of their possessions (8th) in Big Ten games), but they aren’t great either. By the numbers, this isn’t as good of an offensive rebounding Michigan State team as we are accustomed to. The Spartans have rebounded a modest 32% of their misses in Big Ten games (6th) and 32.8% (141st) for the season. With Dawson, Michigan State’s best offensive rebounder, these numbers should take an even bigger hit.

Michigan State touts the best defense in the Big Ten, surrendering just .91 points per possession in conference play. Only five teams have scored better than a point per possession against the Spartans, and North Carolina tops the list at just 1.07 points per possession. Michigan has been held under a point per possession just twice this season, at Iowa State and against Charlotte in Puerto Rico.

The Spartans have great interior defense, leading the league in 2-point field goal percentage allowed, 41.4%, and block percentage. Michigan State also forces turnovers on 21% of Big Ten opponents’ offensive possessions and leads the league in steal rates. The Spartans are among the best teams in the league at forcing turnovers and turning them into points on the other end.

Personnel

Keith Appling and Gary Harris lead the way for the Spartans and they might just be the best backcourt in the Big Ten. Appling is having a career year in his senior season, finally knocking down the three-point shot with consistency and developing into the point guard that Tom Izzo has always wanted him to be.

Harris is a future NBA lottery pick. He’s a dynamic two guard that’s lethal in transition or the halfcourt and gets after it on defense. We profiled his game in our First Look, but he’s finding another level of effectiveness in Big Ten play.

Travis Trice is a serviceable backup point guard. Over half of his field goal attempts are threes, but he connects at a 42% clip. He’s not a great passer and his assist rate of 18.7% is about equal to Michigan’s Derrick Walton.

Denzel Valentine is an all or nothing proposition. He can make some brilliant plays, but he makes his fair share of ugly ones as well. With Michigan State’s injuries, Valentine’s rebounding ability (he had 12 rebounds when these two teams played in East Lansing last season) and versatility should be critical. He could very well play the four position at times if Michigan State tries to go small to match the Wolverines. Valentine isn’t a great shooter (30% on 3s, 44% on 2s), but he’s Michigan State’s second best passer after Appling.

In the frontcourt, things get a bit dicey. Payne is probably the best big man in the Big Ten. He can run the floor, he can crash the glass, post up or step out and hit the three. But he’s hurt and not expected to play. Without Payne and Dawson, the Spartans are without their starting frontcourt and best rebounders (Dawson is the No. 2 offensive rebounder in the conference).

Matt Costello has started at the five for most of this season, but he plays just 32% of available minutes. Costello has 10 field goals and 7 turnovers in six Big Ten games. He’s a low usage player, but he can protect the rim and he did score 8 points against the Wolverines last season.

Kenny Kaminski is expected to start in Branden Dawson’s absence at the four. Kaminski is a completely different player than Dawson. While Dawson is a strong, imposing, athletic forward with a knack for grabbing defensive rebounds, Kaminski is a prototypical stretch four. Kaminsiki is shooting 55% on 3-point attempts and 82% of his shots are threes. Kaminski will be able to stretch the floor much more effectively than Dawson, but the Spartans will lose some rebounding punch.

Gavin Schilling and Alex Gauna will also be called upon to shoulder significantly more minutes. Michigan State’s backup big men both measure in at 6-foot-9 and 240+ pounds, but Schilling is the better rebounder of the two, but hasn’t played double digit minutes since December while Gauna registered 20 minutes at Northwestern.

Keys

  • Defensive rebounding: It doesn’t matter that the numbers say this is the worst offensive rebounding Michigan State team since 2004. It doesn’t matter that Branden Dawson is sidelined. Until Michigan proves otherwise, defensive rebounding will be a concern against the Spartans – especially in East Lansing.
  • Stop Gary Harris off screens: Harris is tremendous at playing without the ball and Tom Izzo is masterful at designing half court sets designed to get him the ball in the right spot. Caris LeVert, Nik Stauskas and anyone else that ends up guarding Harris will be challenged to keep up with him.
  • Stop Keith Appling on isolation: Without so many frontcourt options, expect the Spartans to spread the floor and isolate Keith Appling on Derrick Walton or Spike Albrecht. Kaminski in the lineup means that Michigan’s defense won’t be able to pack in the paint, and that’s a prime opportunity for Appling – one of the best isolation players in the Big Ten – to attack.
  • Transition defense: Michigan’s transition defense was tremendous against Iowa and now the Wolverines face the only team in the league that runs more often than the Hawkeyes. The Spartans are a great transition team, and will look to run even more in front of a raucous home crowd.

Bottom Line

Ken Pomeroy projects a 71-66 Michigan State victory, but gives the Wolverines a 32% chance at pulling off the upset. Add in injuries to Adreian Payne and Branden Dawson and it’s tough not to muster at least a bit of enthusiasm about the Wolverines’ chances.  The opportunity to steal a third win over a Big Ten contender before the end of January is golden.

  • Chezaroo

    So excited for this game! This is not a typical MSU team regarding post scoring, and the injuries have devastated their normal rebounding prowess, especially on the offensive glass. A golden opportunity is absolutely correct. Does an interior rotation of Costello, Gauna, and Schilling scare anyone? Kaminski is a perimeter floater with some grit to him, but he shouldn’t be a factor on the glass. I expect Harris and Appling ( if completely healthy also ) to have a combined 35-40 shot attempts, and be their whole offense. The intangible is always that rabid boisterous crowd that Izzo absolutely knows how to milk. Go Blue!

  • kam

    It’s official Payne is out… I think we can win this.. I think Caris and Irvins defense on Harris will be huge, so will Walton on Appling! They’re not the typical MSU so I doubt we get killed on the boards.. I look for Glenn to be able to drive by whatever 4 they play with no Dawson or Payne. Also I’m interested to see how Nik does with Harris guarding him. GO BLUE

  • guestavo

    That MSU injury report on ESPN was one of the most shameful things I’ve seen. Izzo is already reaching for excuses.

    • jemblue

      Izzo is such a drama queen. “Toughest decision of my life”? Come on.

  • Mattski

    Obviously, Payne is a marvelous player, Harris great and Dawson marvelous when things click for him. But statistically MSU doesn’t look that great. Have they been a little over-hyped anyhow?

  • chazer

    This game just feels like MSU is going to get a jump out of losing its best rebounder. I don’t like the additional motivation a team gets on its home court and our history at Breslin.
    Izzo will try and take NIK not only off of his game but out of it. Look for the guards to initiate contact on NIK to get him into foul trouble….JB said they “get into you physically” and that strategy played well into our foul trouble last year. I’ll be looking to see if the guards attack NIK when he’s on defense to see if they get the home call with the crowd. If “NIKY three ball” can get 20 plus tonight they have a chance to win.
    I’m hoping our experience at Duke and IS gives us some composure and maturity because we’re going to need it. As many of you said I think Walton is the key but also Irvin on Harris could be fun to watch.
    GRIII needs to have a big night!
    Go blue!

    • Kenny

      Agree that the refs could be the X-factor but they need to maintain basic consistency less consistent. Our backcourt is a bit deeper than theirs, and can play rough on Appling and Harris too. With a problematic shoulder and wrist, Appling is especially venerable. My worry is that their bigs will wrack Nik and GRIII very hard as part of their interior defense, and the refs just let them play.

      • gobluemd16

        I think their guards are going to be really physical with Nik and try not to let him move towards the basket. Izzo is telling them to make the refs blow their whistles, and to be as physical as possible with Nik until they do.

        • chazer

          You two have the same concerns as I…they will deny NIK the ball and harass him all night. It will be a great test for NIK and should be a heck of a game.
          I’ve seen a few games this year were the new rules have been ignored and the games are very physical. The first 5 minutes should be very interesting and I expect Michigan to be better prepared after last years game.
          You can bet JB is running tape of blood running down Zach Novak’s face from 2011. His type of determination and grit will be needed tonight. This game reminds of playing hoops at the Y and fighting to stay on the court…it probably won’t be pretty!
          NEXT!
          Go Blue!

  • gobluemd16

    Made the trip half way across the country for this one! Go Blue!

  • Jay Z

    I love the link to “Debacle.”

  • jemblue

    That memorable game three years ago really was a program-changer – since then, we’re 39-14 in B1G play, best in the conference.

    • Mattski

      Great stat.

  • rlcBlue

    I always want this game to depend on the in-state kids and it almost never does, but…

    Morgan, Horford, and Walton vs.
    Appling, Valentine, Costello, and Gauna

    The opportunity is there for Morford to dominate Sparty’s front line. Walton’s not going to beat Appling, but slowing him down will be enough. Valentine is a big x factor in the game – they need somebody to step up and help Harris and Appling, and he’s a strong candidate.