First Take: South Dakota State, Havoc

Dylan Burkhardt
Mar 12, 2013; Sioux Falls, SD, USA; South Dakota State Jackrabbits guard Nate Wolters (3) looks on against the North Dakota State Bison in the first half during the championship game of the Summit League tournament at Sioux Falls Arena. Mandatory Credit: Brace Hemmelgarn-USA TODAY Sports

Michigan is back in the NCAA tournament and will open play as a No. 4 seed against No. 13 seeded South Dakota State on Thursday at 7:15 p.m (CBS) at the Palace of Auburn Hills. Here’s a first look at South Dakota State along with a run down of notes, reactions and more in regards to Thursday’s game.

A year ago most expected Michigan to be a No. 3 seed before the Wolverines drew a No. 4 and a match-up with a 13-seed that featured one of the best high usage guards in the country. A year later Michigan finds itself as a No. 4 seed once again and ready to face off against Nate Wolters and South Dakota State. Wolters isn’t DJ Cooper. He’s actually a better, more efficient offensive player.

South Dakota State played its way into the NCAA tournament by finishing the season on a high note. The Jackrabbits won 14 of their last 15 Summit League games including three tournament games to seal a bid. Overall the Jacks outscored Summit League competition by an impressive .19 points per possession in league games, the second best mark in the conference.

South Dakota State features a great offense, ranked 39th nationally by Ken Pomeroy, but its defense is lags well behind, ranked 209th by Ken Pomeroy. Michigan has played just four Division I teams with a worse adjusted defensive efficiency this season; Central Michigan, Binghamton, Cleveland State and IUPUI. The Wolverines scored 323 points on 259 possessions in those four games.

In many ways, South Dakota State is a similar team to Michigan. The Jacks high powered offense relies on low turnover numbers, lots of threes and not many offensive rebounds or free throws. Defensively, South Dakota State doesn’t foul and excels on the defensive glass but struggles to force misses or turnovers. Tempo wise, both teams are content to play right around 64 or 65 possessions.

The Jackrabbits have a marquee victory to hang their hats on, a 70-65 win at No. 3 seeded New Mexico. But their resume is also scattered with a number of losses. Losing at Alabama, Minnesota (without star guard Nate Wolters), Belmont and Murray State is explainable but losses at Hofstra (Kenpom 302) and Cal State Bakersfield (Kenpom 241) are head-scratchers.

Know the Name: Nate Wolters

The Jackrabbit attack is centered around 6-foot-4, 190 pound senior Nate Wolters. Wolters is a rare breed of player because he doesn’t just use a high percentage of SDSU’s offensive possessions, he’s also extremely efficient.

Michigan fans have a perfect reference point to judge Wolters’ efficiency. Among players that use at least 28 percent of their team’s offensive possessions, Wolters is one of two players in the country more efficient than Trey Burke.

Rank Player Team ORtg Usage
1 Kelly Olynyk Gonzaga 125.7 29.7
2 Nate Wolters South Dakota St. 124.8 30.3
3 Trey Burke Michigan 124.3 29.0
4 Doug McDermott Creighton 122.7 31.3
5 Erick Green Virginia Tech 120.0 31.7

While the level of competition in the Summit League clearly isn’t equal to the Big Ten, these are the sort of numbers that are rare at any level of college basketball.

Wolters is capable of putting up points in a hurry, including 53 points on 28 shots against IPFW. And while we’ll obviously focus on Wolters more in the coming days, his highlight reels are impressive:

There are few holes in Wolters’s game. He shoots well inside (55%) and outside (39%), he has a high assist rate and a low turnover rate, he gets to the free throw line, and even has the knack to pick up steals.

The 6-foot-4 guard is a difficult match-up for Michigan. The Wolverines don’t have a stereotypical lockdown defender or a natural fit. Trey Burke is certain to relish the challenge but he lacks size, and frankly energy, to guard a player of Wolters’ caliber for 40 minutes. Tim Hardaway Jr. could have the frame to give Wolters problems but he’s never been regarded as a great on-ball defender.

Short rotationS

The Jackrabbits aren’t a particularly deep team, ranking 342nd in bench minutes nationally, but still have plenty of experience.

South Dakota State lost to Baylor in the round of 64 last season and seven of the eight Jackrabbits that played in that loss are back in South Dakota State uniforms. The Jackrabbits will lean on tournament experienced players while Michigan is likely to play five freshmen with no NCAA tournament experiences.

South Dakota State played just seven people total in its Summit League tournament run. Jordan Dykstra, Chad White and Tony Fiegen all average double figures while Brayden Carlson isn’t far behind at nine per game.

Dykstra is a prototypical pick-and-pop big man. The 6-foot-8, 235 pound power forward connects on 43% of his threes and 46% of his twos. Dykstra is also the best Jackrabbit defensive rebounder and despite his perimeter oriented game, he should have a size advantage over Glenn Robinson III.

6-foot-7, 220 pound Tony Fiegen anchors the middle. He’s the lone Jackrabbit starter that doesn’t shoot threes but is an able finisher inside (55%).

Brayden Carlson and Chad White serve as the primary wing shooters to play off of Wolters. Both players have attempted more threes than twos this season and connect at 36 and 43 percent clips respectively.



After last year’s 4-13 upset, Michigan isn’t going to do much talking about what lies ahead but the potential four-five match-up of Michigan against Virginia Commonwealth is mouthwatering. In just his fourth season at VCU, head coach Shaka Smart has already led the Rams to a Final Four..

VCU’s “Havoc” pressing style of defense is as advertised. The Rams force turnovers on 28.7% of their opponents possessions, that’s more than any team in the country. The intrigue comes from the fact that Michigan turns the ball over on just 14.3% of its offensive possession, better than any other team in the country.

If VCU and Michigan were to face off in the round of 32, it’s safe to bet that turnovers could tell the story.

VCU is just 2-7 when its opponents turn the ball over on 23% of their possessions or fewer and 24-1 when they cough the ball up more often. Michigan has turned the ball over on more than 23 percent of its offensive possessions just once – in its loss at Michigan State.

One of our favorites, Sports Illustrated’s Luke Winn, broke down VCU’s havoc defense in depth earlier this week. Winn also wrote a VCU feature in the print magazine earlier this yaer and goes into as much detail as you could ask for into the 1-2-1-1 zone press.

Michigan has really only faced one true pressing defense this season in Arkansas. the Wolverines turned the ball over on 18.8% of their possessions in that one against an Arkansas team that forces turnovers on 24.6% of its opponents possessions (14th nationally).

  • guest

    The guy doesn’t seem to want to shoot with his left hand. Look at all of his lay-ups. All right hand.

    • steve s

      And yet he has no problem going to his left and never gets his shot blocked.

      • Adam

        Most people don’t get their shots blocked in highlight videos

        • Mattski


        • steve s

          SDSU has had 85 of their shots blocked this year out of 1887 shots taken. That’s about 4.5%. Most blocked shots (SDSU included) come from opposing bigs, so it’s reasonable to assume that Wolters has had a lower percentage of shots blocked.

          Let’s assume that half of those blocks came against Wolters (very generous assumption), or a block rate of 2.25%. Wolters takes an average of 15 shots per game. Let’s assume that 20% of those are right-handed layups when he’s going left (again, very generous). Three of these shots with 2.25% of them getting blocked is 0.0675 per game.

          In other words, thinking we’ll be sending these into the rafters all game long is kind of stupid, as is your snarky reply.

          • Kyle

            Sorry steve, but sounds to me like you’re the one being Snarky.

            Chill out man, some one was making a simple observation.

            And he has a point, highlight videos are of highlights…

            No one’s arguing with you steve.

    • Mr_Sledge

      I noticed that too. There was only maybe one shot on the left side with his left hand.

  • steve s

    Winning formulas seems simple. SDakSt: run, run, run. SDakSt is inefficient on D and only plays 7 guys. Defend the 3 point line, box out, get out and run. VCU: break their press = break their will. Be extremely precise breaking the press with the pass, get a lot of easy buckets early, make them come out of it. If we do that, game’s over quick.

    • steve s

      P.S. Glad we don’t have to face an athletic offensive team until potentially the sweet 16, but SDakSt scares me more than VCU.

  • BetTheOver

    Michigan wins this game by scoring 90 points. SDSt has the #209 defense on KenPom which is worse than every big ten team and non-conference foes such as Eastern/Western Michigan. (By contrast last year’s Ohio squad had a top-50 KenPom defense)

    Wolters can get his 40 points, but it won’t matter.

  • Josh

    Not looking past S Dak, but worth noting Re: VCU. I live in Philly, went to UM undergrad and Temple Law, so I follow both — due to location, I go to all Temple home games and follow both leagues on TV. VCU is exceptionally average in half court Offense and Defense. I knew Temple would be a tough matchup for VCU because Temple has a lot of ball handler. St. Louis is a veteran team and beat up VCU both times they played. VCU is a tough matchup for a team without good guards — Butler this year in the A10 comes to mind. VCU’s system is effective against any level of college competition if you do have good ball handlers (their Final Four run is good proof). In the half court, though, they do not match up all that well. They rely a ton on transition 3s and fast break buckets. Their offense completely stagnated vs. Temple as Temple dealt with their pressure. One other note – they foul a LOT. When they play at home, those fouls are not called as much. On the road/neutral, those fouls are more likely to be called. They rotate a lot of guys in because of this so depth is not an issue. FT shooting against them is an issue. They get you into the double bonus early. You have to make them pay for it at the line.

    Michigan is very good at taking care of the ball. I’m not particularly concerned about that — its the FT shooting that worries me. Of all the “good” teams VCU could draw, drawing the one with the POY best PG on it probably was not high on their list. Beat S Dak St., first of all. Then we can look ahead.

  • Tony

    Yikes….I was looking at’s Pick Center, and they list each team’s 5 most similar teams (since 2000)….here are Michigan’s most similar teams:

    2012 Missouri (2 seed that lost in first round)
    2009 Florida (lost in 3rd round of NIT)
    2001 Ohio State (5 seed lost in first round)
    2007 West Virginia (won NIT)
    2012 South Dakota St. (last year’s version of the team we play in the first round….14 seed that lost in the first round)

    • Davester

      I think you mean West Virgina.

    • jemblue

      That list doesn’t make a lot of sense. How could we be that similar to a huge range (from #2 to #14) of seeds (and one NIT team)?

  • Champswest

    I think Michigan got a very good draw. It won’t be a cake walk, but if we come to play, we have a great chance of advancing into the second week.

  • robpollard

    Was that Wolters mixtape video shot through a submarine periscope, deep in the Instagram Ocean?

  • ChathaM

    It’s interesting that every analyst seems to be conceding the VCU-Akron game to the Rams. I realize that Akron’s regular PG is out, but I watched them play Ohio on Saturday; a team that plays the same style that VCU plays; and beat them by 20. Granted, the VCU pressure is somewhat more intense than Ohio’s, and DJ Cooper played horribly, but that is a pretty good Ohio team. Akron will not be an easy out.