Notebook: Caris LeVert could see increased role

Michigan 58, Michigan State 57-19
Dustin Johnston

Four minutes into Michigan’s game against Michigan State, Branden Dawson’s elbow made a firm connection with Nik Stauskas’ face. Stauskas went down in the bloody heap and was escorted off the floor with a towel covering his blood soaked face. It was clear that Michigan would be without its best perimeter shooter for the duration of the game.

But while Michigan was down a shooter, in Stauskas’s place stepped a much-improved defender in Caris LeVert. As a defender, Stauskas seems to have regressed as the season has worn on; LeVert, on the other hand, seems to get better on the defensive end with every game.

To illustrate this point: Stauskas was matched up with Gary Harris, and just before Stauskas got hurt, Harris had blown by him for an easy layup. LeVert came in for Stauskas and Harris, with LeVert guarding him, didn’t score again until the 5:50 mark in the first half.

"In that particular game, he really did extremely well for us defensively, given who he was guarding, how he guarded him,"  Beilein said during a press conference on Tuesday. "He did a wonderful job there."

Harris finished the game shooting under 50 percent from the field and just 2-for-7 from beyond the arc. LeVert was in his face all game, playing 30 minutes in place of the injured Stauskas.

There’s no doubt that Stauskas is a valuable asset offensively with his shooting as well as his effectiveness in the screen-and-roll game. However, it’s clear that LeVert is the better defender of the two freshmen, and after Sunday’s performance Beilein said that could mean an increased role for LeVert.

"When we see a guy come off the bench – it’s no different when you see a guy come off the bench and he scores 22, he’s probably going to play more minutes. Well, he (LeVert) kept Gary Harris from scoring 22. He really guarded him well, and that usually deserves more time."

Michigan pondering bigger lineup

John Beilein has expressed his desire to play with two bigs before, but Jordan Morgan’s ankle injury on the road against Illinois put a definitive hold on any plans for implementing a two-big lineup. There simply weren’t any players who knew both the four and the five positions well enough to run it.

Now that Morgan is back to near full strength, however, Beilein is ready to continue playing him at the four, with Mitch McGary or Jon Horford at the five. McGary and Morgan were both on the floor quite a bit against Michigan State, with excellent defensive results.

Of course, if you’re going to "go big" against any team, it would be Michigan State, with the Spartans’ duo of Derrick Nix and Adreian Payne. Beilein said whether or not he decides to play two bigs at the same time truly depends on the match-up.

"I think it all depends on who we’re playing. That is both offense and defense," Beilein said. "When we’re running offense against some teams, a bigger lineup is not the right thing to do, and against others it’s a great idea. And it flips to defense. So it all depends on who we’re playing and that particular match-up out there."

Still, the flexibility that Morgan’s return brings to the coaching staff is undoubtedly welcome. Morgan said it opens up an entirely new kind of offense, one predicated more on attacking the rim than perimeter jump-shooting. It was arguably what enabled Michigan to defeat the Spartans despite not hitting a 3-pointer all game.

"I think we’re able to command more of a presence defensively when it comes to cleaning up rebounds. Offensively, just getting people open and I think it allows us to attack the paint a little more," Morgan said. "We have two big screeners out there, two people going after the offensive glass, I think when we had a big lineup we were able to clean up the offensive rebounds and get some putbacks and things like that, extra possessions."

Players-only meeting yields excellent results

After the particularly debilitating loss at Penn State on February 27th, the Wolverines decided they needed to hold a players-only meeting on their day off. They went to Pizza House and hashed out a few things.

Among them was the idea that individual players needed to take ownership of their own mistakes and work to correct them now, seeing as how the season is ending in about a month. While Jordan Morgan described the meeting as "laid-back," the focus was on taking action in the present to correct mistakes.

Morgan, however, had a different message, and unarguably one the team has taken to heart is game demeanor is any indication.

"My message for the team during that meeting was a little different. It was more about the passion that we played with. When we started the season, before we were even playing games, we were in practice and we were just passionate about getting better every day.  It was fun for us to come and get better. I just felt like after losing some tough games – close games, games that weren’t close – I didn’t feel that same passion from this team. The passion to win, to have fun, to get better. It was starting to get like, ‘we’re back at the gym again’ instead of ‘we’re back doing what we love to do again.’ I just encouraged everybody to think back to what it was like when we started the season, when we started practice. That feeling that we had coming into practice just playing with each other. That’s what I had to say."

Injury notes: Nik Stauskas has been cleared to play against Purdue. He also had just four stitches put in, not the widely-reported 12. Beilein: "I loved the way he bounced back and showed toughness." … Jordan Morgan says his ankle is "above 90 percent," but Beilein doubts he’ll get back to full strength for the remainder of the season.

  • Mattski

    Good stuff. One way to read this–more two-big sets and more Caris–is that the rotation is expanded. That’s a good thing going into the home stretch. If Nik uses the change as a goad then he can come in off the bench, dead-eye some three pointers, and keep himself in the upcoming games.

    • Retiredat23

      Stauskas clearly needs to step us his defense

  • DutchWolverine

    I love Caris’ energy, athleticism, and D. But please work on shot selection. I get nervous every time he has the ball waiting for him to jack up a 3.

  • sshow

    I know I can’t be the only one watching this OSU vs. IND game.

    • MGoTweeter

      Officials are destroying this game. Really bad calls going both ways over the last few possessions

  • MGoTweeter

    Gotta give Ohio credit. They ve played an unreal defensive game considering the officiating they are working with. Add to that craft is making shots I have never even seen him take.

  • sshow

    It’s not over yet but all I can think of is when Beilein made a comment about the B1G champ having 5 losses and several commentators downplaying that comment as nonsense. Wow! OSU up 11 wow!

    • MGoTweeter

      I didn’t necessarily think it was nonsense but I’ll admit I thought some team would make it through with only three or at worst there would be a tie at four.

      • sshow

        Yeah, I didn’t think it was nonsense either. I just remember people on the B1G network or espn saying that it was nonsense. I also thought someone would make it through the B1G gauntlet with 3-4 losses. Never would have guessed that IND would lose 2 at home.

        • gpsimms

          Beilein said 6, which is what I think everyone scoffed at. 6 was completely ridiculous.

          • Mattski

            I think he said fiver or six, and that doesn’t look so dumb now. The point was that the conference was going to be tough, and it has been.

  • MGoTweeter

    Craft is playing out of his mind.

    Is it just me or did olidipo first get fouled in the air than come down before he shot the ball? Yet the refs call neither

  • MGoTweeter

    Great view there of tv teddy watching hulls maul smith and no call. It is really hard to get excited about the college game with these refs

    • MGoTweeter

      Sorry for the soapbox rants on officials. I’ll stop now

      • sshow

        I’ll rant for you…that knock down of Smith was an obvious foul.

    • Mattski

      That was deplorable. The refs were so determined to give IU their outright championship, and craft and Thomas would have none of it. Gutty, gutty win. I

      • Mith

        And yet the ESPN article talked about how the officiating favored OSU.

    • Adam St Patrick

      You mean when IU was trying to foul at the end to stop the clock? Seemed oddly defiant or oppositional, as a child might be with his parents or somesuch.

      I too thought the reffing was terrible but man what a game. It’s a shame the refs have to be the weak link, but gimme that any day over the NBA.

  • MGoTweeter

    I will be honest part of me was hoping that Indiana won just so michigan could play with no expectations tomorrow night and Sunday. Once again michigan controls its own destiny for a B1G title.

    • umnyc

      Was thinking the same thing, but at the end of the day we’ve got yet another shot… So time to man up and get it done.

  • http://www.umhoops.com/ Dylan Burkhardt

    Another Tuesday and another IU loss. Michigan controls its own destiny (again) for a share of the Big Ten title: at Purdue, vs. IU.

    • mgoblue82

      vs Purdue, not @ Purdue

      • UMQuasi

        No, @ Purdue

    • Retiredat23

      I was telling everyone the same things last night as I (swallows hard, starts to sweat) rooted for OSU to win.

  • rlcBlue

    BTT Seeding update:

    The count of scenarios (out of 64 possible) in which each team receives each seed:

    Team 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th
    Hoosiers 54 6 4 0 0
    Badgers 8 14 11 16 15
    Bucknuts 2 29 23 9 1
    Sparty 0 9 16 21 18
    Michigan 0 6 10 18 30

    OSU has all but clinched a day off next Thursday; the only way they get the 5 seed is if they lose to Illinois and tie Wisconsin for fourth while UM, IU, and MSU are co-champs.

  • http://twitter.com/DaddyLipton Marc Lipton

    When I watched the game that night, I saw MSU Score 8 pts on the first 3 possessions, all taking adv of Stauskas. When tony and I walked out, I casually mentioned Stauskas and vogrich in the same breath, as in could Stauskas become vogrich by his senior year.

    Over the summer, the question will be, will Stauskas raise his D more than leVert raises his O?

Previous post:

Next post: