First Look: Oregon Ducks

Dylan Burkhardt
on

Michigan will face No. 3 seed Oregon in the Sweet 16 on Thursday (7:09 p.m., CBS). Here’s an early breakdown of what the Ducks bring to the table.

Chris Boucher’s injury, small ball

Oregon relies on what is essentially a four-guard starting lineup and its dependence on perimeter players has only increased since 6-foot-10, 200 pound senior Chris Boucher tore his ACL in the Pac-12 Tournament.

Boucher was an elite shot blocker — and projected second round pick — who enabled the Ducks to play a two-big look or have a more versatile option at the five. Boucher came off the bench, but losing a potential pro this late in the season is never easy. The injury has forced Oregon head coach Dana Altman to go all in with his small ball look.

6-foot-7, 225 pound junior Dillon Brooks has played over 30 minutes per game at the four spot since the injury and he’s an incredible versatile and dangerous matchup for most four men.

The Ducks still have Jordan Bell and reserve big man Kavell Bigby-Williams to man the five (and play spot minutes at the four) but Brooks along with Payton Pritchard, Casey Benson, Tyler Dorsey and Dylan Ennis will account for almost all of the minutes at the 1 through 4.

In the 204 possessions that Oregon has played without Boucher, they’ve allowed 232 points (1.14 points per possession compared to their Pac 12-leading average of.97 points per trip). That’s an obvious drop off, but it is also a very small sample size including games against some very talented teams.

The loss of Boucher will negate some of Oregon’s shot-blocking, but it provides a couple of problems. First, the four-guard look is probably ideal to switch ball screens and could give the Wolverines’ some issues due to Oregon’s versatile lineup.

Second, it leaves Michigan in a tricky spot trying to contain Brooks. He seems like a natural match-up for Zak Irvin rather than DJ Wilson, but if the Wolverines want to play Wilson with Moritz Wagner, then Wilson is presumably going to have to cover Brooks.

What kind of problems does Brooks present? He’s a 41% three-point shooter, but he’s also Oregon’s best playmaker. He can distribute the ball and get down hill and finish over defenders. That ability to put the ball on the deck and overpower people could make him a tough cover for Wilson, who has struggled at times against powerful and quick, but undersized offensive players.

Here’s a solid DraftExpress breakdown of Brooks’ game.

Tyler Dorsey — an emerging problem

Michigan fans know full well how dominant Derrick Walton has been over the last couple of weeks, but Oregon wing guard Tyler Dorsey has been an even more efficient and productive scorer.

Dorsey is averaging over 23 points per game through Oregon’s last 5 after reaching 20 points just twice this season against a major conference opponent. Here’s a look at how their numbers over the last five games compare:

Walton and Dorsey aren’t likely to match-up — I’d expect Zak Irvin or Muhammad-Ali Abdur-Rahkman to draw the assignment — but the 6-foot-4 wing has been putting the ball in the basket at an incredible rate. He’s more of a score and then score again type of player who isn’t going to make a big impact with his passing ability, but keeping him off the scoreboard is a problem.

Attacking the offensive glass

Oregon was just an average offensive rebounding team throughout much of the season. The Ducks ranked 7th in the Pac-12 in offensive rebounding rate this year and hadn’t rebounded over 40% of their missed shots since a December 28th game against UCLA.

Over the first weekend of the NCAA Tournament, Oregon flipped that script. The Ducks grabbed 50% of their missed shots vs. Iona and 44% against Rhode Island and averaged 18 second chance points per game.

Iona (289th) and Rhode Island (198th) weren’t good defensive rebounding teams, but that newfound aggression on the offensive glass should be a concern for a Michigan team that has done a poor job on the defensive glass in its last four games.

Transition game

Oregon has one of the best transition offenses remaining in the Sweet 16. The Ducks don’t force the tempo as often as Kentucky and UCLA, but they are more efficient. They aren’t quite as efficient as some of the more selective offenses (Butler, Michigan and West Virginia), but they push the tempo more often.

Michigan’s defense generally does a great job of limiting transition opportunities, but the Ducks thrive in an unsettled back-and-forth game.

Multiple defensive looks

Oregon will mix up its defense quite a bit and is very aggressive and disruptive. The Ducks led the Pac-12 in block rate and steal rate and forced turnovers on 20% of their league opponents’ possessions.

Oregon runs zone on 39% of its defensive possessions and grades out in the 83rd percentile. It plays man defense on 61% of its defensive possessions and grades out in the 95th percentile.

The Ducks force more turnovers in their zone look, which sounds like its a bit of an amoeba defense and it helped the Ducks win against Arizona this year.

“Our zone worked very well, they didn’t really know what to do with it,” Brooks said after that win. “Our zone is different, kind of a match-up zone and we get after it in there. We forced turnovers and it worked out great for us.”

An Oregon blog summarizes it as such:

The Ducks will start in a zone press, then slide into a match-up zone, and when the offense gets to a spot where all 5 guys are matched up with an offensive player they should be guarding, they switch to a man to man. Then if the offensive post player goes to set a high pick or beyond the arc, they slide back to the match-up

The Ducks will also utilize a zone press on 14.7% of their defensive possessions. At this point, the soft zone press is basically a staple in the game due to the shorter shot clock.  Michigan has seen that action quite a bit due to their fairly deliberate offense and the switching defenses appear to work as Oregon ranks 323rd in average defensive possession length.

The catch with multiple defensive looks is that they are a puzzle. They might cause some confusion for three or four possessions, but they are solvable in the end. Michigan has seen an array of different defenses this year, but how quickly they adjust to the changing looks will be critical.

3-point shooting

This is a match-up of the two most three-point happy teams left in the Sweet 16. The Ducks don’t attempt as many threes as Michigan, but they attempt more than anyone else still standing. 40% of Oregon’s field goal attempts are threes and they connect at a 38% clip (42% in Pac 12 play)

Michigan’s defense has hung its hat on its ability to prevent three-point attempts in recent weeks, but this will be one of the most perimeter-oriented teams that the Wolverines have faced in quite a while.

A rematch

These teams played two years ago in Brooklyn, NY in a game that Michigan won, 70-63, featured several of the same players. Derrick Walton, Zak Irvin and Mark Donnal all played heavy minutes on Michigan’s side, along with Dillon Brooks, Casey Benton and Jordan Bell.

Muhammad-Ali Abdur-Rahkman and DJ Wilson also saw the floor, but very limited time. The next day, they faced off against another current Oregon player, Villanova transfer Dylan Ennis. Ennis (6-foot-2) had this memorable block against DJ Wilson which essentially ended his freshman season.

Looking back at that recap, a game in which Ricky Doyle was a star, this line stand out:

Michigan was unfazed by Oregon’s token pressure, turning the ball over on just 13% of its possessions, and shot 49% on twos and 38% on threes for a 51.1 eFG%. Michigan’s pick-and-roll game faltered a bit due to Oregon switching every ball screen on the perimeter, but the Wolverines were eventually able to exploit those switches and just attack the rim.

Stop me if that sounds familiar. Attacking switching defenses has been a focus for the Wolverines over the last month and they’ll be put to the test once again.

Defensively, Michigan’s biggest problem in that game was on the defensive glass where it allowed Oregon to rebound 45% of its missed shots, including 5 offensive rebounds by Brooks.

These are two very different teams, but the with some of the same players, coaches and styles of play, that first meeting can provide at least a bit of insight about what to expect on Thursday night.

  • Fab 5 Legends

    great preview…i like this matchup a lot more than the Louisville matchup to be honest…especially with Boucher out…ill take an Oregon defense over Louisville defense that disrupted Walton and overplayed our 3pt shot making …our 3’s will have to be on also…i think we also have matchup problems for them too….Rebounding was important against Louisville and it will be against Oregon too…i think every game from now on rebounding will be the key against these more athletic teams…our defense has stepped up and as long as we keep scoring/getting contribution from everyone we should move on…Go Blue! what an amazing season…turnaround team of the year

  • ChiMan

    I’ll say it….Dillion Brooks is kind of douche (huge, huge flopper) but he’s talented and can go on crazy scoring runs. He’s my biggest concern by far.

    • Hey man, don’t get your Dylan/Dillons mixed up.

      • ChiMan

        Lmao…..I don’t know that I’ve EVER hit edit that fast!! :-P

  • ZRL

    Seems like the type of game where Duncan gets 30 mins and we roll with whoever is playing better between Wagner and Wilson in the second half. Better matchups on defense (Irvin guards Brooks) and offense (Duncan vs zone).

  • Nick

    Man, I remember the crowd chanting “Rick-y Doy-le.” Speaking of which, did anyone see that he needed to have a “lifesaving operation”? http://www.winknews.com/2017/02/22/fgcus-ricky-doyle-recovering-after-lifesaving-operation/. This seems to at least partly explain his poor play his last year at Michigan.

    • Whoa nice find. He also was battling sleep apnea at U-M. Scary stuff.

  • andygoblue

    This Oregon team sounds more similar to Okie State offensively, based on my relatively uneducated read of things. How do they compare in terms of transition offense ORB, and other factors?

  • Bob

    Why is this the case?

    ‘but if the Wolverines want to play Wilson with Moritz Wagner, then Wilson is presumably going to have to cover Brooks.’

    • Because I don’t see Wilson covering a 6-2 guard or a 6-4 wing very effectively (he struggles to contain dribble drives against smaller players).

      • Bob

        gotcha…guess the other option is to play smaller and give Duncan more minutes.

        • Yep, the other option is to split the minutes at the five between DJ and Moe and go with the four guard look with Duncan at the four (although I’d assume that Irvin checks Brooks in that case). We’ve seen a lot of that lately and it might come in handy against the spread look.

          • Jay

            Since Oregon’s not a huge team and Duncan struggles defensively, do you think we could see a lot of X in this game in a 2 PG lineup?

          • X hasn’t really played well in the NCAA tourney thus far, so I’d bet probably not.

      • malcolm bolt

        He gets beat a lot on baseline drives by smaller players.

  • MattBuckets

    Definitely going to be a chest match to begin the game with personnel, I wouldn’t mind trying Wilson on brooks early and making Brooks take tough contested jumpers. I think Wilson can play a little off to stop driving lanes, and also think he does a great job of blocking shots from behind if smaller guards do get by him.

    • malcolm bolt

      Love how Wilson is playing, but he has a tendency getting beat on baseline drives by smaller players.

  • Abraham Gonzalez Jr.

    Let’s talk how they going to cover our bigs cause I see us picking them apart as well …. Bring on these ducks … Let’s go blue

  • malcolm bolt

    Dylan, I’d think ZI is the natural matchup to cover Brooks with occasional different looks. Wilson nor Wagner is a good cover against Brooks’ speed. They’d be in foul trouble asap.

    • That’s what I said in the article, but if you want to play two bigs then who does DJ guard?

  • Chris De Sana

    Seems like a classic case of which team forces the others hand.

    Can Michigan two big line up impose it’s will by taking advantage of switches as MO did last game or is Michigan forced to go small due to their speed and handles.

    Could be an opportunity for the two big PNR we saw only a few times previously. Whichever big has the the advantage heads to the block for some old school bully ball. If affective it would create space at the 3 ball line.

    Will be fun to watch.

  • bobohle

    No matter how we play it big or small, I just believe this is the Wolverines year and at the end the staff will have made the necessary adjustments that will bring home the W.

  • John Billington

    Please tell me who Wilson has struggled against I can’t think of any.