Game 31: Michigan at Nebraska Preview

Dylan Burkhardt
on
Basics
Who: Michigan (19-11, 9-8 B1G) at Nebraska (12-17, 6-11 B1G)
Where: Pinnacle Bank Arena (Lincoln, NE)
When: 8:00 p.m., Sunday, March 5th, 2017
TV: BTN

“I’d just like to say one thing, I really thought our guards were good. I like this team and I can’t wait to play Michigan again. We’ll welcome them into Pinnacle Bank Arena with open arms and I’m excited for the game already, I wish we could play it tonight.”

That was Tim Miles, unprovoked, after wrapping up his post-game press conference on January 24th moments after the Wolverines beat the Cornhuskers 91-85. That was rock bottom for the Wolverine defense, wrapping up a five-game stretch that saw it allow 1.23 points per possession to open Big Ten play. Since then, Michigan has shown significant improvement defensively, allowing just 1.01 points per possession over its last 12 games.

Meanwhile, Nebraska’s season never quite took off. The Huskers started the Big Ten season 3-0, but have won just 3 of 11 games since and were drubbed by Minnesota 88-73 on Thursday night. Tim Miles finally gets his rematch, but the final game of the Big Ten regular season might not have the importance that he once hoped.

The Cornhuskers

Nebraska has been outscored by 5.7 points per 100 possessions in league play. The Huskers are scoring 1.01 points per trip (11th), but allowing 1.07 points per trip. The January meeting between these two teams featured Nebraska’s best offensive performance of the season at 1.22 points per possession, but also its worst defensive performance at 1.3 points per possession.

The strength of Nebraska’s offense is its ability to crash the glass and the Huskers rebound 34% of their misses in conference play (3rd). That’s a solid number, but many of Nebraska’s best wins came in some of its worst offensive rebounding games. Like most offenses, Nebraska is best when it is shooting the ball well, but that doesn’t happen often. The Huskers have made just 45.3% of their twos (13th) and 34.8% of their threes (9th) for a 47.2 eFG% (11th).

Nebraska attempts only 28.4% of its shots from three-point range, the second-fewest in Big Ten play, which speaks to its ability to get downhill and attack the basket. Despite that nature, the Huskers get to the free throw line less often than all but 2 Big Ten teams (29.2 FTA/FGA).

Defensively, Nebraska has been beaten by the three-point shot. The Huskers allow 33.7% of their opponents field goal attempts from three-point range (8th) and are allowing a league-worst 41.7% from long distance. Three-point luck could play a factor in these numbers, but there’s only one game left in the season to correct it. Nebraska’s interior defense is more respectable at a 46.6% two-point percentage allowed, but that’s still good for a 52 eFG% (12th) in the Big Ten. Forcing turnover has been one bright spot for Nebraska, which ranks 3rd in the Big Ten in steal-rate and 6th in turnover rate. Finally, the Huskers are just average on the defensive glass and avoiding fouling.

Personnel

6-foot-4 senior Tai Webster took a little while to find his grove, but he’s been impressive as a senior. Webster uses 29.4% of Nebraska’s offensive possessions and is relentless in his ability to get down hill and attack the basket. In February I noted that he attempted almost as many shots at the rim as some of the league’s best big men and that was tough for Michigan to contain in the first meeting. Webster scored 28 points on 12-of-20 shooting, grabbed 9 rebounds and handed out 4 assists in the first meeting.

6-foot point guard Glynn Watson is smaller than Watson, but he’s a better perimeter shooter (44%) and very comfortable playing out of the pick-and-roll. He’s Nebraska’s most efficient ball screen player because of his ability to shoot off the bounce, even though his overall shooting numbers are a bit lacking. He’s only shooting 41% inside the arc in Big Ten play, but also had a huge game in the first meeting (22 points on 9-of-16 shooting) as the Wolverines struggled to contain him.

6-foot-7 big man Ed Morrow missed the first meeting, his first of 7 missed games in the middle of conference play. The Huskers were 1-6 in Morrow’s absence and he provides a physical presence on the offensive and defensive glass along with a shot blocking threat around the rim. Morrow isn’t great offensively, making just 47% of his twos, and almost all of his offense comes around the hoop.

Nebraska has been constantly shooting for a perimeter shooting threat to stretch opposing defenses and Jack McVeigh has been the best option. McVeigh is shooting 38% from three-point range in Big Ten play and made at least 3 triples in each of Nebraska’s last 3 wins.

6-foot-11, 275 pound freshman Jordy Tshimanga has started the last 9 games and emerged as something of a post-up threat. He’s a load to handle on the offensive and defensive glass and a foul magnet, but he shoots just 47% on twos. He turns the ball over on more than a quarter of his offensive possessions which means he’s susceptible to the double-team, but the bigger question might be whether he can guard Moritz Wagner on the perimeter.

6-foot-7 freshman Jeriah Horne has emerged as another shooting threat to track off the bench. Horne is shooting 33% from long distance, but he’s made at least one triple in 6 of Nebraska’s last 7 games. 6-foot-5 Samford transfer Evan Taylor starts on the wing, and he’s not the most-efficient offensive player — 45% 2-point shooting, 21% 3-point shooting, 20.5% turnover rate — but he’s an active defender who will also take mid-range jumpers.

Keys

  • Pick-and-roll defense: Nebraska ranks 5th nationally and leads the Big Ten in percentage of possessions that end out of a pick-and-roll, but are just the 10th most efficient in the conference. Michigan was shredded by the ball screen game in the first meeting and that’s putting it gently and showed a few signs of struggle at Northwestern on Wednesday as well. The Wolverine defense has improved, but this will be a good test of just how much.
  • 3-Point Shooting: I discussed how important the three-point shot was to Michigan, both offensively and defensively, in a post on Friday and Nebraska had one of its best shooting games of the season in the first meeting, making 9-of-18 threes. Michigan will need to win the three-point battle on Sunday night to leave Lincoln with a road win.
  • What version of Moritz Wagner? Wagner’s home-away splits are staggering and Michigan needs to figure out how to get that home-version of Wagner to travel. Wagner is averaging 9.3 points per game on the road, shooting 49% on twos and 36% on threes compared to 14.9 points per game at home, shooting 73% on twos and 44% on threes. Can he finally bring that production on the road?

Bottom Line

Despite all of the talk that Michigan is an NCAA Tournament ‘lock’, it would be best off taking care of business in Lincoln on Sunday night. KenPom projects a 70-66 Michigan win, giving the Wolverines a 63% chance at wrapping up the season with a road victory.

To store them in one handy place, here are the Big Ten Tournament seeding scenarios for Michigan:

  • 6 seed with a win, Maryland win, Northwestern win, and Iowa loss.
  • 7 seed with a win, Iowa loss, and either MSU or Purdue win.
  • 8 seed with a loss or Iowa win.

 

  • Fab 5 Legends

    A win would guarantee our NCAA birth…honestly think we would still be able lock with our RPI, SOS…but you are right, a win would make us nice and comfortable for Selection Sunday….would love to play Iowa again on a neutral game or Minn/NWestern…Go Blue!

  • Chace

    Indiana just won so if we win pretty much a guarantee will play them in big tourney…. really wanna avoid them there dangerous wouldn’t be surprised to see them win it in all honesty.

  • Wayman Britt

    I am not as comfortable as others saying that if UM loses at Nebraska they still will make the NCAA tourney. I sure hope the teams plays hard and for the full game. Sure would be nice to see Zak and DJ play good.

  • Chace

    Looks like we’re the 8 seed

  • bobohle

    As Iowa is blowing out PSU we will be the Eight Seed now.

  • Champswest

    I was wondering if anyone else remembered Miles statement in the post game presser. It surprised me at the time. Was surprised to hear smack coming from him. Wasn’t quite sure what he was hinting at. If he had a beef about the game or if he was just confident about the rematch.

    • I mean his guards did play really well, not sure what the beef was other than it sucks to play your best offensive game of the year and lose.