In our first of three position preview articles, we break down Michigan’s guards with stats, video breakdowns and analysis.

Michigan has sent six guards or wings to the NBA Draft since 2011. The Wolverines’ flowing offense, effective pick-and-roll game and outside shooting prowess slowly morphed into something of an NBA factory over the last half decade.

Michigan lost yet another guard to the NBA from last year’s roster in Caris LeVert, but the good news is that it was forced to adjust to playing without LeVert on the fly as he was sidelined for the second half of last season.

For the first time since 2010, the 2016-17 roster might not feature any pros in the backcourt, but there is still talent and experience for John Beilein to work with. The Wolverines have two returning starters and the most promising member of their freshman class to lean on in the backcourt.

michigan-guards

Derrick Walton – Senior – Point Guard

Walton was snubbed from the Bob Cousy award’s top-20 watch list — a list that he made comfortably two years ago — and has almost been forgotten in the wash after an up-and-down career. An injury-ruined 2014-15 season derailed Walton’s career to a degree, but he has the tools to put everything together as a senior.

Walton boasted a 68.1 eFG% on catch-and-shoot opportunities. That’s 6 percentage points better than Duncan Robinson. twitter

It’s pretty easy to define where Walton excels — three-point shooting, ball control, defensive rebounding and defense. Walton is an elite rebounder for his size, a skill that’s relatively unmatched at the Division I level. He’s the best returning defensive rebounder on Michigan’s roster and he was the 14th best rebounder in the Big Ten — at 6-foot-1.

He’s also a uniquely capable catch-and-shoot player for a point guard. Per Synergy Sports, Walton boasted a 68.1 eFG% on catch-and-shoot opportunities. That’s 6 percentage points better than Duncan Robinson.

It’s also easy to point to where the senior point guard needs to make dramatic improvement: scoring inside the arc.

For as impressive as Walton’s 47-of-102 shooting off the catch was last season, he made just 34% of the rest of his field goal attempts. Walton’s two-point shooting numbers have plummeted from 45% as a freshman to 32% as a sophomore and 36% as a junior. As a junior, he posted the lowest free throw rate (FTA/FGA) of his career at just 36.2% and his struggles inside the arc have hamstrung the rest of his game.

“I sense he’s going to have much-improved numbers in that area between 15 feet and one foot, where it is tough, tough twos,” Beilein said at Media Day. “Every NBA team, every college team is trying to get guys to take tough twos, right? And that’s what Derrick will have to make, right, for as long as he plays basketball.”

His problems are two-fold. First, he’s not a great jump shooter off the dribble. Walton made just 26.6% (31.6 eFG%) of his jumpers off the dribble last season according to Synergy Sports, a performance that ranks in the bottom third of Division I. While he does a great job of creating space for his off the dribble jumpers, he just hasn’t been able to find consistency with the shot.

But the biggest problem has been that when he gets all the way to the rim, he can’t finish. His two-point struggles seemed to start as a sophomore when he suffered an early season turf toe injury, but at this point it seems to almost be a case of the yips. Walton is athletic enough to grab over five boards per game, but he just can’t figure out how to score around the basket in ways that his predecessor Trey Burke was so effective.

It will be very interesting to see how Walton is used in the offense this season, especially with the addition of Simpson. The Wolverine offense is lacking a bit of three-point shooting punch with the losses of LeVert and Aubrey Dawkins, which leaves a pretty strong case to play Walton off the ball as much as possible.

“You should look forward to seeing both of them (Walton and Simpson) in the backcourt at the same time,” Beilein said at Media Day. “Let Derrick come off and just hunt shots and let X run the team. You could see that more than you’d ever expect.”

Assuming that Beilein is looking at the same Synergy statistics that we are, I’m going to take him at his word that he plans to play Walton at the two quite a bit this season.

Muhammad-Ali Abdur-Rahkman – Junior – Shooting Guard

For the first time in two seasons, Abdur-Rahkman will begin a season as a starter — the same role where he’s finished the last two.

His ability to put his head down and get a basket at the rim is unmatched on the Michigan roster. He shot 51% on twos last season despite a relatively high degree of difficulty on most of his attempts.

Quietly, Abdur-Rahkman improved in almost every statistical category from his freshman season. He raised his eFG% to 52%, cut his turnover rate in half, improved his three-point shooting and got to the free throw line more often.

The 6-foot-4 seemed to reach a new level of consistency down the stretch last season, reaching double figures in Michigan’s last seven games. Here we have a guy that many would argue was Michigan’s best player over the last month of the season, yet no one seems to be mentioning when looking at this team.

Abdur-Rahkman has already discussed approaching the game with a changed — more aggressive and confident — mindset this season and the opportunity should be there for him to take a step forward offensively.

The two areas where his progress stagnated: distribution and rebounding. It’s the distribution where Michigan will look for him to take the next step as a junior, and what will be required to see his usage in the offense increase. While he graded out in the 82nd percentile nationally scoring off the pick-and-roll, per Synergy, he found himself ranked in the 24th percentile passing off out of ball screen action.

The 6-foot-3 junior assisted just 13 baskets — 7 to the roll man, 4 to spot-up shooters and 2 to cutters — out of ball screen action in 2016. If he can improve on those numbers, the sky is the limit given his natural slashing ability.

The 6-foot-3 junior assisted just 13 baskets out of ball screen action in 2016. twitter

Xavier Simpson – Freshman – Point Guard

Simpson is one of two x-factors that will determine just how much this Michigan team improves. The addition of Simpson to the mix gives Michigan another reliable ball handler and perimeter defender. It also means that Andrew Dakich won’t be in the rotation barring another rash of injuries to the guard position.

The freshman from Lima, OH should provide a spark of attitude to a roster that needs it.

“I’m definitely trying to make an effort to bring that here,” Simpson responded at Michigan Media Day when asked if he hopes to bring more ‘dog’ to the team. “But that’s really just me. I’m more of a dog type of point guard that’s going to come and knock you over.”

Simpson is a down hill point guard. He’s known for his effort on the defensive end and his ability to attack the basket in transition. He was a good finisher both in Nike EYBL play and in high school and posted a positive assist to turnover ratio on the Nike EYBL circuit. His shot has been questioned by many, and is a bit of a push shot, but he did shoot 35% from distance on the Nike circuit.

It’s probably unfair to expect Simpson to come in with a mastery of the pick-and-roll — his size will be a detriment and the majority of his assists on the Nike circuit seemed to come in transition — but he’s going to play and he’s going to play a lot.

“Here’s what I’ve seen with Xavier: he’s very, very quick in small spaces, when he’s got to,” Beilein said. “He’s almost like a running back that can hit the hole and just cut and get into spots, he’s really good at that. He really sees the game very well.”

Minutes Projection

With 80 minutes to split across the two guard positions, I’d expect close to a 30-30-20 split as a baseline. While I think that Walton and Abdur-Rahkman will both probably end up playing a bit more than 30 minutes per game, I also have a hard time seeing Simpson slip below 20.

That leaves the possibility of Abdur-Rahkman sliding to the three position for extra minutes, giving the Wolverines a three-guard look. That’s an option that could give Michigan a defensive boost, but also might lack some shooting and provide interesting depth questions off the bench.

Bottom Line & Predictions

While Michigan has serious concerns defensively at the three and four position, the backcourt group has the ability to be much improved, potentially one of the better defensive groups under Beilein, who has already praised the quickness available to him.

“I also like the idea, having that quickness out there, we have two very, very quick guards,” Beilein said. “When Connecticut won the national championship a few years ago with two quick, small guards, that’s very appealing to us defensively to have that type of quickness on the perimeter.”

On the other hand, shooting with this group is a real concern. Caris LeVert was so effective in the back court because he could score at every level — off the catch, off the bounce and at the rim — and pass it too. This group has guys that can score off the catch (Walton), off the drive (Abdur-Rahkman) and in transition (Simpson), but I’m not sure there’s a five-tool player that can do all of the above.

But at the end of the day, this group will be judged based on how Derrick Walton, now a senior, performs. He’s the best leader on the roster, he’s had the ups of winning big games and the downs of bad losses and injuries. We haven’t seen him put everything together since he showed so much promise as a freshman, but this is his last chance and he has the skillset to do it.

Three Predictions:

  • Derrick Walton shoots better than 45% on two-pointers and leads Michigan in scoring.
  • Muhammad Ali Abdur-Rahkman racks up 100 assists — up from 61 last season.
  • Xavier Simpson averages over 20 minutes per game.
  • gobluemd16

    This article was awesome. I hope those bold predictions come true — could mean big success for the team.

  • mikey_mac

    Love the integration of video packages … Can they get edited down a bit more, though, to just the relevant moments?

    • Fair point, some of them get a little long, but was trying to save some time. I see what you guys mean.

      Streamable player work okay for everyone? Seemed pretty lightweight and clean.

  • Champswest

    Dylan nailed it.

  • Lanknows

    This is excellent stuff. Great details on the strengths and weaknesses of each player.

    Walton I’d expect to play at least 32 mpg. He can play besides anyone, Simpson or MAAR, and is arguably Michigan’s best
    player. He’ll be the constant while Simpson/MAAR will have to battle for
    the remaining 48 minutes or so, IMO. I think it might be closer than some
    people expect.

    In regard to finishing, it does seem like Walton rarely gets foul calls at the rim. Perhaps his strength is a detriment here.I think he needs to work on being a little more demonstrative when he gets contact. I expect Beilein to run a lot of his offense sets geared towards Walton’s strength areas this year.

    Simpson’s size may limit time against some opponents – so I think around 20 mpg seems right.

    MAAR’s obviously very good as an individual scorer, but needs to improve off the ball and of course as a passer. Turnover avoidance is made a lot easier if you rarely pass. While his 3% was good in the non-conference, opposing teams still sagged off him and 31% against Big Ten teams was woeful – barely better than the previous season’s 29%.

    The progression from freshman to sophomore year was encouraging – hopefully he can repeat that. Reasonable goals of getting to 35% on 3s in conference play while improving his assist rate closer to 15% (between last years 11% and Walton’s 24%) would be major strides forward. Otherwise we might see Simpson cut into some of his minutes. I would guess minutes hold steady at around 28 per game, perhaps even a small drop.

    I have doubts about playing all 3 together simply because MAAR and Simpson both need the ball to be effective on the offensive end.

    I do like the potential of the Walton/Simpson backcourt against second units.

    • mikey_mac

      I think your point about MAAR and Simpson both needing the ball for efficient spacing is smart, but if MAAR creeps up just a bit to 40% 3PT, that is completely mitigated. You can’t close out too hard on someone with his ball skills, so he becomes a very dangerous wing.

      • Lanknows

        Agreed. The question is what reasonable expectations for MAAR’s 3% are. An optimistic can see going from 29% to 37% and expect him to hit 40% in his third year. A pessimist can look at the Big Ten numbers going from 28% to 31% in Big Ten play and expect him to fall somewhere below 35%.

        With this one, I’m on the pessimistic side mostly because MAAR’s career FT% is below 75%. Reasonable minds may disagree.

        • mikey_mac

          I wouldn’t predict 40% either, just pointing out how little improvement (or random luck) it would take to reach that level. 35% is the baseline for PPP efficiency on this team, though, so the margin for error is razor thin on 100 attempts …

  • bebopson

    Nice article. Re MAAR’s rebounding, there’s nice clip in Derrick’s video that shows him passing to DWalt for a spot up 3, then he’s halfway down the court before the ball touches the net. 15:10 in the ND game.

    • That’s by design. If a guard is shooting, the other guard should almost always be getting back on defense.

      W/r/t improving on the glass, I would focus almost entirely on his defensive rebounding numbers.

  • Wayman Britt

    Great analysis. The guards should be a strength on this team, although I am concerned about their defense. Walton and MAAR have not shown they can consistently stay in front of their man. I hope that turns around this season.

    • mikey_mac

      I agree, the two players widely considered UM’s best individual defenders have shown real consistency issues there, especially with regards to on-ball defense. I think overcoming UM’s individual deficiencies is where Donlon will help most with improved team concepts. There’s a lot to correct in one offseason, though!

  • bobohle

    The X man will be the positive X factor this year. GO BLUE!

  • robpollard

    Good overview. Also — those videos remind me how ugly our tourney uni’s were; I had blocked them out. Hopefully we won’t have embarrassments like that under Nike/Jordan.