Five Key Plays: Iowa 71, Michigan 61

Zach Shaw
on

In Saturday’s regular-season finale, the Michigan basketball team had an opportunity to write its own narrative to end the season and win its way into the NCAA tournament. Instead, the Wolverines fell behind early and never completed a comeback, losing to No. 16 Iowa, 71-61.

The loss puts Michigan’s tournament hopes in jeopardy, and raised similar concerns to other losses in the season. Here are our five key plays from Crisler Center on Saturday.

1) Donnal sparks first-half rally

As has become a pattern in conference play, the Wolverines fell in a hole against Iowa, trailing 15-5 and then 22-12. A combination of Michigan’s sputtering outside shooting and Iowa forward Jarrod Uthoff’s 13 points in the opening nine minutes left the Wolverines in a familiarly uncomfortable position on their home floor.

But sparked by good hustle plays on both ends of the court from junior forward Mark Donnal, Michigan went on an 11-2 run to prove that it wasn’t going to be blown out. Donnal scored seven points in 3:32 of game action, and the Wolverines were right back in the game.

2) Jok creates distance to close half

Though Michigan began to find some offensive success to close the first half, it still entered halftime down six. That was thanks in large part to blown assignments on Peter Jok, who knocked down two 3s in the final minutes of the first half to outpace the Wolverines.

The two shots — one off of a screen, another simply in Aubrey Dawkins’ face — exemplified a struggling Michigan defense that continues to appear stagnant when it should be improving. Of course, playing one of the best teams in the country never helps.

“I think we all saw the Iowa team that beat Purdue twice and beat Michigan State twice, they really have a good team,” said Michigan coach John Beilein. “(But) we’ve got to make repairs and we’ve got to play better to prove that we belong in the NCAA tournament.”

3) 1-3-1 gives Michigan a chance

The defensive struggles continued in the second half, as Iowa was able to build up to a 15-point lead, but it all came crashing down when Michigan switched to the 1-3-1 zone on defense. In the stretch, the Wolverines went on a 10-0 run and forced turnovers on three consecutive possessions to pull within five.

Crisler was as loud as it had been all night as Michigan had a real chance at a comeback, and it was all because of the defense. Even if it was just a short-lived glimmer of positivity, the potential was evident.

“This is part of the process,” Beilein said. “We’re going to be good, whether it’s this year or next year of the year after. It’s just part of the process of getting better.”

4) Comeback bid runs out of steam

In many ways, the table was set for Michigan to take control of the game. With a home crowd behind them and all the momentum in their favor, the Wolverines had a legitimate opportunity to punch their ticket into the NCAA Tournament. But the comeback bid sputtered in the ensuing minutes, however, as Michigan seemed to lack a go-to scorer to take the game over.

Of course, two previous go-to players, seniors Caris LeVert and Spike Albrecht, were on the bench. Without any seniors and playing one of the most experienced teams in the country, the Wolverines failed to convert on the upset chance, missing two consecutive jumpers and turning the ball over and giving Iowa the larger lead it needed to pull away.

“We have to be able to control that, and we did not,” Beilein said. “We took some bad shots, and just had a couple times where we needed to be more poised in that run. And I get it, everyone was all jacked up and ready to go, but that’s not the way we need to respond.”

5) Uthoff And-1 puts it away

Even with the momentum shifting back to the Hawkeyes, Michigan kept itself within six with just over a minute to go. But when the Wolverines flubbed a intentional foul situation, Jarrod Uthoff (who led the game with 26 points) converted a 3-point play to put the game out of reach.

Michigan did not look like an NCAA tournament team Saturday night and proved that, even at the end of the regular season, it is still making youthful mistakes.

“(Iowa) was doing the same things and making the same mistakes we were doing when they were all sophomores and juniors. The exact same stuff,” Beilein said. “(This year) is the winningest team they’ve had, but when they were freshmen and sophomores, they were doing the same things we are. So yeah, we have experience, but we don’t have that type of experience yet.”

The Wolverines will enter the Big Ten Tournament in Indianapolis as an 8-seed, and will likely need two wins to secure a spot in the NCAA tournament. Though it ended the season losing four of five games, Michigan still has one final chance to push itself into postseason play.

“Teams that go through this are going to be better at the end of the year, they’re going to be better when they’re seniors because they understand the give and take and what it takes,” Beilein said. “You’ve got to look at the holistic point of view here and see what you can do and say, we gave it everything we have and it wasn’t enough tonight. If it’s not enough to get us in the NCAA tournament, it’s not enough. We survived that before here at Michigan and we’ll survive it again.”

  • Wayman Britt

    Beilein keeps saying UM did not have any seniors playing, while MSU, Wiscy, Iowa and Maryland had seniors and that was why they were top of the standings. Now, do you think Zak and Derrick will improve that much next year to get UM in the top three of the Big Ten and to the Sweet 16?

    Can Zak eliminate all his turnovers and play tough D and Derrick become a consistent player game in game out and finish at the rim?

    I would love to see it, but I am not so sure those two change just because they are seniors.

    • scipiodreams80

      Ya know, a lot of guys who looked awful bad at points of their careers show out their senior years.

      I’m as disappointed in this year as anyone, but the people who act like, “oh, ho hum, it’s just another offseason, another year of physical maturing, they’ll look just the same,” are nuts in my book.

      Heck, how did Jordan Morgan look before his final year?

      • Wayman Britt

        I will give you that Zak and Derrick may improve next year, but I don’t think they have enough to get UM to the Sweet 16. I am not saying they are bad, they just don’t have enough talent to play with MSU, Maryland and IU.

        • A2MIKE

          All depends on X. If he can be a playmaker, and run the point and effectively move Walton to the 2 that would be huge. Maar is a big unknown as well. If he can come tinue to develop that shot he has more upside than both Walton and Irvin.

          • AA7596

            if having seniors makes all the difference, it’s hard to then expect X (a good but not off-the-charts recruit) to walk right in and take over the point.

            I’m more hopeful that we get more out of Irvin and Chatman next year. Chatman has finally started to see the floor a little bit; his presence can shift Irvin off the 4. That plus a normal offseason for Irvin is our best shot at a brighter 2017.