Game 28: Michigan at Maryland Recap

Dylan Burkhardt

Michigan played a thrilling back-and-forth game in College Park on Sunday afternoon, but just couldn’t figure out a way to escape with a road upset over Maryland.

The best and worst of this Michigan team was on display in the loss.

The Wolverines continued to struggle defensively against dribble penetration and against forwards with size. They still had a painful field goal drought in the first half (7:25) and fell into a double-digit hole. They still had several fast break opportunities or layups that ended up instead as turnovers and fastbreak opportunities in the other direction.

But unlike some other losses this season, Michigan showed off its good side too. The Wolverines executed their pick-and-roll offense to perfection in the second half as Mark Donnal went for 25 points on the game. The Wolverines hit their threes for the first time in what feels like weeks, knocking down 13-of-27 long range attempts. And mostly importantly, something that we just haven’t seen consistently enough this season, Michigan battled.

John Beilein’s team fought its way out of a 16 point first half hole, taking the lead in the second half. Then after Maryland took it back, Michigan fought its way back to another lead. After falling woefully short at Ohio State in the effort category, the Wolverines traded blows with the top-ten ranked Terps despite committing a myriad of mistakes that they’d love to have back.

maryland factors

This game was a track meet with 40 first half possessions and 75 for the game. Both teams were loose with the ball and the offense was free flowing throughout despite Michigan’s first half drought.

In the second half, Michigan’s offense started clicking in a way that it hasn’t for weeks. The Wolverines scored 46 points in 35 second half possessions against the Big Ten’s best defense — a respectable 1.09 points per trip for the game. Mark Donnal’s 22 points on 11 second half shot attempts powered the offense, but they were the result of ball movement and pick-and-roll flow that has been absent for weeks. For the game, Michigan tallied an impressive 22 assists on 32 made field goals,

Defensively, one of the biggest differences was at the free throw line. The Terps attempted 19 free throws to Michigan’s 8 and while there was some late game fouling, Trimble’s ability to pick up free throws late in the game helped balance out the Terp offense.

Outside of Trimble, who also had 7 turnovers to just one assist, Michigan had no answer for the lengthy combination of Robert Carter and Jake Layman, who combined for 33 points on 19 shots after tallying 33 points on 21 shots in the first meeting.

The saving grace for the Wolverine defense was its ability to force turnovers. The Terps gave the ball away on 24% of their offensive possessions which led to 21 Michigan points. On the flip side, that means that Maryland scored 1.51 points per possession when it didn’t turn the ball over. When the Terps ran their offense and stayed under control, Michigan just couldn’t come up with the defensive answers and allowed Maryland to shoot 59% on twos and 44% on threes.

At the end of the day, this is the sort of feel good loss that only means something if it can turn into something more. Donnal’s (re)emergence, Chatman’s minutes off the bench, Abdur-Rahkman’s passing ability — these things have to be permanent if Michigan wants to take a step forward. Michigan played one of its better games in weeks, but still has nothing to show for it.

Wednesday’s home game against Northwestern is setting up to be a season defining game. A win won’t necessarily punch Michigan’s ticket to the NCAA tournament, but a loss could rip it to pieces.

Player Bullets

  • Mark Donnal: Donnal wasn’t just good in the second half, he was dominant. The big man was the best player on the floor and almost willed Michigan to victory. He hit 3 triples on 4 attempts, but also made 7-of-9 two-point attempts and finished ball screen after ball screen around the rim. Donnal’s lost some of the consistency he showed early in Big Ten play, but he was just phenomenal against one of the Big Ten’s best front lines. He didn’t just catch drop-off passes for layups, he also hit threes to stretch the floor and blocked five shots around the rim to shore up an otherwise porous defensive effort.
  • Derrick WaltonI thought Walton got a bit out of control at times in the first half and he had 5 turnovers to 5 assists, but he also scored 14 points and hit a few threes. The charge to foul him out late was a tough call (here’s Walton’s take) and hard to see from my vantage point on the other end of the floor. I still think Walton finds himself taking too many early shot clock threes when he’s far more effective off the catch — especially via the flare screen action that Michigan has been throwing in of late.
  • Muhammad-Ali Abdur-RahkmanI thought this was one of his best games that Abdur-Rahkman has played. He flat out stole two baskets grabbing lazy inbound passes and he also tallied 9 assists to just 1 turnover to go along with three steals. His ability to chase down opposing fastbreaks and send them the other way is also an underrated skill set. His didn’t shoot the ball poorly either, making 2-of-5 threes and 4-of-8 twos on the day.
  • Kameron ChatmanKameron Chatman was the primary reason that Michigan was able to claw back into this game in the first half. He was 3-of-20 from three-point range entering Sunday’s game and knocked in two critical triples to help narrow the gap while dishing a pair of assists in eight minutes. His contributions off the bench — essentially he was all Michigan had off the bench — were as important as they were unexpected.
  • Zak IrvinJust when you get frustrated with Irvin’s shot selection or decision making, he hits a huge shot. He made some big-time plays in the second half to keep Michigan within striking distance, including three assists in the final 20 minutes. But the botched inbounds plays were a hot topic in post-game after he threw away two possessions by trying to force the ball in rather than call timeout.
  • Duncan Robinson: Duncan hit a couple threes and got involved off of some nice cutting action early in the first half, but he’s also been making some pretty costly mistakes of late. In the first half he missed a layup and then saved the ball out to halfcourt, resulting in a three-point play. Late in the second, he bobbled a simple catch on the wing and fumbled the ball out for bounds.
  • Aubrey DawkinsDawkins only played four minutes and was the second wing option off the bench, falling behind Kam Chatman. His defense has really suffered in recent games and he finds himself facing the possibility of slipping out of a rotation that isn’t deep to begin with.
  • Ricky DoyleDoyle played 10 minutes and missed both of his shot attempts around the rim and the drop-off from Donnal remains significant.
  • Moritz WagnerI think everyone sees the potential in Wagner, but he’s still too liable to make mistakes on the floor. He played a minute in the first half and was pick-pocketed at midcourt for a fastbreak layup.
  • Chezaroo

    The fight brought today was inspirational. But when do we ever come up with a roster that has some ability to slow down the oppositions dribble penetration? Just flat out far to easy to score on this group. Props Donnal, now build on that pick and pop acumen going forward. Great game young man.

  • umnyc

    Would have been really nice to pull this one out, but certainly not a crushing blow to the season, and hopefully something to build on for the stretch run. Donnal was a beast today. Period. But the drop off to Doyle has become staggering. He looks like a middle aged arthritic man out there. I’m wondering if he’s injured. Regardless, DJ should probably be passing him on the depth chart. MAAR was also a bright spot. With a little more development, he might be one of our more dangerous players moving forward. Turnovers just killed us. We have so little room for error to give up that many possessions in a game and expect to win. Its even more troubling that 9 of those TOs came from Derrick and Zak.

  • gobluemd16

    I was at the game so didnt have the total best vantage point (was at about the free throw line behind MD’s bench front of second level), but I thought the refs were KILLER to us in the last five-ish minutes. Two of the drives Trimble got to the line, he just threw his head back like Harden and Walton was walled up, playing good defense. Melo flopped. That led to four points and foul trouble for DWalt. The loose ball after MAAR missed a layup, that they called a foul on Zak was horrendous. Those plays changed the momentum after we had a 3 pt lead. Then obviously the call at the end on Walton to foul him out, which I couldnt see as well, but seemed to be very difficult to call at that juncture. We obviously made other mistakes, turned it over, gave up late O rebs, etc but that stretch totally gave them momentum. Otherwise, fantastic fight from our team. Thats my biggest takeaway — they never gave up. Donnal was obviously fantastic, and this was one of MAAR’s best performances. We got killed in the first half on that run when any bench players were in, and as Dylan said, clearly anyone but Mark is a huge step down at Center (who’d have thunk it). It is too late in the season for moral victories, though. Absolute must-win Wednesday.

    • Mattski

      Thank you.

  • Wayman Britt

    Loved the scrappy play and ability to battle back. I hope against Wisc or Iowa, that all 5 or at least 4 players are all playing good, so UM can get two more wins before the Big Ten tourney so they can make the dance. UM cannot go two years without making the dance, not with all the resources they have

  • ChathaM

    I’ve been impressed with the rebounding improvement over the past few games. It’s kind of a lost stat when you lose 2 of 3, but they’ve done a good job on the boards.

    I was happy to see Chatman contribute. It comes at Dawkins’ expense, but it’s pretty simple when it comes to Dawkins; he just can’t guard, and you can’t play when you’re the weakest defender on an already weak defensive team. His close-out on the Maryland corner 3 in the first half (Brantley’s shot, I think) was ridiculously bad, and you just can’t afford to play a guy like that unless he puts up a lot of points per game of his own.

    The replay of Walton’s 5th foul from under the basket was clear; it was a pretty easy offensive foul call. Nobody should dispute that call.

    I’m still fully on board for this season, but I can’t help but look ahead to next season’s team. In the big picture, things look good, with every current active player back, in addition to some freshman possibilities. But, I also worry about whether the same deficiencies of this season will remain next year. We know that guys will get stronger over the summer, but will the guys who can’t guard people today be able to guard them 9 months from now?

    • On the rebounding: Michigan is ranked third in the conference in defensive rebounding. That’s impressive.

      • gobluemd16

        We want Illinois to win this game, right?

        • Yeah, I don’t see any reason why not. Wisconsin looks pretty vulnerable from what I can see on my SlingBox feed at the airport.

          • gobluemd16

            This is the crazed fan in me, but only from a desperation factor if they lost both this game and @Iowa before playing us at home next wkend.

          • Quick 15-0 Wisconsin run has changed this one. Welcome to the Kohl Center (or Illinois basketball).

          • gobluemd16

            Woof that one changed quickly. Kohl Center sure does give Wisconsin the benefit of officiating. I’d be mad if I were Groce.

          • Hard to say if it is the Kohl Center or Illinois just being Illinois.

          • gobluemd16

            Definitely a combo of both.

          • gobluemd16

            Terrible call on Finke there to overturn that. Don’t think his foot touched the line.

      • Mattski

        Is this a little bit of a vindication of Beilein’s approach? It certainly is fascinating. If the talls box and the guards come away with the ball then they’re away on fast break, that would seem to work nicely. It really is a shame that they’ve been so hard-hit. . .

  • Indiana_Matt

    “They’re definitely an NCAA Tournament team,” Layman said about Michigan. “I think it was a good win for us especially in the league. I think going forward it’s going to help us.”

    Who are we to second guess Jake?

  • gobluemd16

    Oh boy. I just rewatched the last 8ish minutes. The 5:35-3:50 period killed us and changed momentum, and that’s where I really think the refs benefitted MD. Three bad calls in my opinion. Two on walton (one of which was undeniable and led to melo FT) and one on Zak on the loose ball. We hurt ourselves with two missed layups in that period, too, but those calls equated to 4 total fouls for D Walt, 4 pts for MD (after we were up 3), changed momentum, and their ball out of the 4 minute timeout.

    • GTFOmycourt

      I just rewatched the first five minutes. Bad calls against Michigan in the first five minutes too!

  • Mattski

    I found myself wondering whether the improved play yesterday might be a function of the whole team, including coaches, saying scr*w it, we’re not getting Caris back, let’s adjust and play ball. Still hate the loss, though, and do think the refs played a larger-than-usual role.