Black Eyes Part II

Last fall I put together a list of the worst games of the 2008-09 season in attempt to damper expectations. This year I put the list together to show off a new development from Ken Pomeroy. Pomeroy released a series of fancy win probability graphs from every division one basketball game last year. The graphs are color coded from blue (least important) to yellow (most important) on a possession by possession basis. Naturally there aren’t many enjoyable graphs to look at from a Michigan standpoint. Anyways, here are the five most painful Michigan losses of the 2009-10 season in visual form:

All of the images are linked to Pomeroy’s full screen graphs (much easier to read) and you can get to any game by clicking the score of a particular game on Michigan’s team page.

vs Ohio State (BTT):

image

It was fitting that Michigan’s season ended as painfully as this one. Evan Turner’s running shot that ended Michigan’s season is one of the more interesting graph’s from Michigan’s season. Pomeroy’s numbers had Ohio State in control for most of the game before Michigan’s late run put them above 90% win probability. Then this happened.

vs. MSU:

image

This is the one game that was really back and forth on the list. Michigan countered every attack by Michigan State and pushed the game back to their side but in the end when it looked like they could finally knock off the Spartans, Kalin Lucas put a dagger in their hearts.

vs. Northwestern:

image

vs. PSU:

image

Alabama (Old Spice):

image

These three are almost identical. Michigan was in control for significant chunks of the game and then fell apart down the stretch. You could just as easily have thrown the Penn State game on the list and it would follow a similar pattern. Certain moments on these graphs stick out – for example the end of the Northwestern game where Michigan takes control before Manny Harris gets beat on a backdoor cut.

This obviously isn’t the happiest way to start the day, if you want to look at a few more cheery graphs then check out the Connecticut, Ohio State, Minnesota, and Creighton games.

  • toblav

    What is shows is lack of staying power. Maybe a loss of focus, maybe a lack of killer instinct. The most changable part of the game seems to be at the end, where a team needs the finishing kick just like a distance runner. The one with the kick usually seems to win.

  • Tom_McC

    These graphs are almost encouraging in a way. Obviously not encouraging because of the end result and the BTT game vs OSU really put an sour exclamation point on the season.

    Looking at the graph though, you realize UM very, very easily could have had 5 more wins which turns a lousy 15-17 season into a decent, but not great, 20-12 season. 20-12 is no great shakes but it just goes to show how small the margin for error is in CBB. Even if they win 3 of those 5, they are looking at 18-14…which again, isn't anything special but it would be far less sour than how the season actually turned out.

    Even with Manny and Sims gone, I think the experiences of the past 2 seasons for the returners(only one for some) will be more valuable than we think. It doesn't guarantee success for next year but I think this team should have some nice motivation for this upcoming season and hopefully they play with a chip on their shoulders.

  • waymanbritt

    These graphs are very telling, we could not close out games.

    Who this year is going to be able to create their own shot, while heavily guarded, late in the game and stick it?

Previous post:

Next post: