<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Numbers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.umhoops.com/2009/12/11/numbers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.umhoops.com/2009/12/11/numbers/</link>
	<description>Michigan Basketball News, Recruiting, and Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 03:53:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: PeteM</title>
		<link>http://www.umhoops.com/2009/12/11/numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-20305</link>
		<dc:creator>PeteM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 15:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umhoops.com/?p=6046#comment-20305</guid>
		<description>Obviously our shooting sucks, but I wonder how much of that is based on the shoooters&#039; all being in a slump and how much based the looks they are getting or shot selection?  Our offense looks tentative, and it seems like last year (and even two years ago) more our 3-pointers seemed to be part of the plan rather than just random shots several feet behind the line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obviously our shooting sucks, but I wonder how much of that is based on the shoooters&#8217; all being in a slump and how much based the looks they are getting or shot selection?  Our offense looks tentative, and it seems like last year (and even two years ago) more our 3-pointers seemed to be part of the plan rather than just random shots several feet behind the line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hambone</title>
		<link>http://www.umhoops.com/2009/12/11/numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-20304</link>
		<dc:creator>hambone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 03:09:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umhoops.com/?p=6046#comment-20304</guid>
		<description>what also scares me is that kansas is #1 at 36.5% opponent shooting percentage...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what also scares me is that kansas is #1 at 36.5% opponent shooting percentage&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hambone</title>
		<link>http://www.umhoops.com/2009/12/11/numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-20303</link>
		<dc:creator>hambone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 22:27:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umhoops.com/?p=6046#comment-20303</guid>
		<description>id suggest that the turnover numbers are low because we aren&#039;t making many/if any passes on the offensive end and instead just chucking up a three early in the shot clock or letting manny drive the basket and throw up an out of control shot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>id suggest that the turnover numbers are low because we aren&#8217;t making many/if any passes on the offensive end and instead just chucking up a three early in the shot clock or letting manny drive the basket and throw up an out of control shot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AG2</title>
		<link>http://www.umhoops.com/2009/12/11/numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-20302</link>
		<dc:creator>AG2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 18:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umhoops.com/?p=6046#comment-20302</guid>
		<description>On the contrary, passing it around the perimeter leads to intercepted passes and run outs for wide open layups.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the contrary, passing it around the perimeter leads to intercepted passes and run outs for wide open layups.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dylan</title>
		<link>http://www.umhoops.com/2009/12/11/numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-20301</link>
		<dc:creator>Dylan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 17:47:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umhoops.com/?p=6046#comment-20301</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s last year&#039;s profile with rankings in parenthesis:

http://kenpom.com/team.php?y=2009&amp;team=Michigan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s last year&#8217;s profile with rankings in parenthesis:</p>
<p><a href="http://kenpom.com/team.php?y=2009&#038;team=Michigan" rel="nofollow">http://kenpom.com/team.php?y=2009&#038;team=Michigan</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dylan</title>
		<link>http://www.umhoops.com/2009/12/11/numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-20300</link>
		<dc:creator>Dylan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 17:44:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umhoops.com/?p=6046#comment-20300</guid>
		<description>I give Michigan credit for the turnover numbers and I don&#039;t think &quot;all they do is pass it around the perimeter&quot;. Beilein&#039;s team *always* value the basketball and it&#039;s clear that this team does at least that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I give Michigan credit for the turnover numbers and I don&#8217;t think &#8220;all they do is pass it around the perimeter&#8221;. Beilein&#8217;s team *always* value the basketball and it&#8217;s clear that this team does at least that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JayRich</title>
		<link>http://www.umhoops.com/2009/12/11/numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-20299</link>
		<dc:creator>JayRich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 17:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umhoops.com/?p=6046#comment-20299</guid>
		<description>Great point Giddings!  Anyone know what we do when we create a turnover (points off TOs, sort of thing) and where we rank there?  I guess it is not good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great point Giddings!  Anyone know what we do when we create a turnover (points off TOs, sort of thing) and where we rank there?  I guess it is not good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Giddings</title>
		<link>http://www.umhoops.com/2009/12/11/numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-20298</link>
		<dc:creator>Giddings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 17:44:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umhoops.com/?p=6046#comment-20298</guid>
		<description>Also, I would be curious to see how last year&#039;s team ranked in the categories listed above.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, I would be curious to see how last year&#8217;s team ranked in the categories listed above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Giddings</title>
		<link>http://www.umhoops.com/2009/12/11/numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-20297</link>
		<dc:creator>Giddings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 17:42:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umhoops.com/?p=6046#comment-20297</guid>
		<description>The thing about the low turnover numbers is... when all you do is pass the ball around the perimeter, the risk of turning the ball over is extremely low.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thing about the low turnover numbers is&#8230; when all you do is pass the ball around the perimeter, the risk of turning the ball over is extremely low.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maxwell's demon</title>
		<link>http://www.umhoops.com/2009/12/11/numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-20296</link>
		<dc:creator>maxwell's demon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 17:31:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umhoops.com/?p=6046#comment-20296</guid>
		<description>So you&#039;re saying there&#039;s a chance</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So you&#8217;re saying there&#8217;s a chance</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

