<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Game 5: Michigan vs. Alabama Post Game</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.umhoops.com/2009/11/29/game-5-michigan-vs-alabama-post-game/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.umhoops.com/2009/11/29/game-5-michigan-vs-alabama-post-game/</link>
	<description>Michigan Basketball News, Recruiting, and Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 03:53:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: eessddjj</title>
		<link>http://www.umhoops.com/2009/11/29/game-5-michigan-vs-alabama-post-game/comment-page-1/#comment-19647</link>
		<dc:creator>eessddjj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 03:09:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umhoops.com/?p=5908#comment-19647</guid>
		<description>Very, very disappointing week of bball from the wolves. I worry that Beilein&#039;s gimmickry is catching up with him. Fran Franchilla kept saying how to beat the 1-3-1 and a rookie coach and a mediocre team ripeed it up time and again.
Also Douglass can&#039;t make a shot. Sit him down until he proves he is an offensive asset. Missed layups, 3 pointers, got beat on defense. Sit him.
Very disappointing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very, very disappointing week of bball from the wolves. I worry that Beilein&#8217;s gimmickry is catching up with him. Fran Franchilla kept saying how to beat the 1-3-1 and a rookie coach and a mediocre team ripeed it up time and again.<br />
Also Douglass can&#8217;t make a shot. Sit him down until he proves he is an offensive asset. Missed layups, 3 pointers, got beat on defense. Sit him.<br />
Very disappointing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ohmigods</title>
		<link>http://www.umhoops.com/2009/11/29/game-5-michigan-vs-alabama-post-game/comment-page-1/#comment-19646</link>
		<dc:creator>ohmigods</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 02:09:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umhoops.com/?p=5908#comment-19646</guid>
		<description>&quot;Michigan needs to regroup and someone in the locker room needs to step up and become a leader.&quot;

It MUST be Manny</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Michigan needs to regroup and someone in the locker room needs to step up and become a leader.&#8221;</p>
<p>It MUST be Manny</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hambone</title>
		<link>http://www.umhoops.com/2009/11/29/game-5-michigan-vs-alabama-post-game/comment-page-1/#comment-19645</link>
		<dc:creator>hambone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 00:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umhoops.com/?p=5908#comment-19645</guid>
		<description>just last year this week we were talking about making an ncaa tournament based on wins over a (highly overrated) ucla team and a duke team (who beat us by 15 a week prior)... look at the roller coaster we had to endure last season.

i still maintain that we&#039;ll need to have a marquee OOC win - whether at kansas or at home to uconn [bc and @utah are similarly important] if we don&#039;t want to force ourselves into really running through the b10 and have a 11-7ish record (remember a 10-8 psu went to NIT last year because of their poor RPI and their lack of a marquee non-conf W, while both 9-9 michigan and minn went to the dance)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just last year this week we were talking about making an ncaa tournament based on wins over a (highly overrated) ucla team and a duke team (who beat us by 15 a week prior)&#8230; look at the roller coaster we had to endure last season.</p>
<p>i still maintain that we&#8217;ll need to have a marquee OOC win &#8211; whether at kansas or at home to uconn [bc and @utah are similarly important] if we don&#8217;t want to force ourselves into really running through the b10 and have a 11-7ish record (remember a 10-8 psu went to NIT last year because of their poor RPI and their lack of a marquee non-conf W, while both 9-9 michigan and minn went to the dance)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GregGoBlue</title>
		<link>http://www.umhoops.com/2009/11/29/game-5-michigan-vs-alabama-post-game/comment-page-1/#comment-19644</link>
		<dc:creator>GregGoBlue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 23:13:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umhoops.com/?p=5908#comment-19644</guid>
		<description>I think I might be overstating the obvious, but worrying about the national tournament implications of a preseason tournament I believe to be a little premature.

I agree with Tweeter re: man. Especially against Marquette, it was obvious that we&#039;re simply either not athletic enough, or aren&#039;t good enough defenders (yet) to play a considerable amount of man. The 1-3-1&#039;s vulnerability is along the free throw line extended, which opens up the baseline. This problem is solved by better rotation and help defense, it is not simply the &quot;magic way&quot; to break the 1-3-1.

I take a few positives about this weekend. One: these problems occurred all within the first five games of the season. Two: John Beilein as a head coach will have the film dissected and immediately begin addressing problems, including ones we can&#039;t even conceive of ASAP.

I believe that we just need to find our rhythm and our roles. We&#039;ve got a great head coach, we&#039;ve got great players, we&#039;ve got the entire season in front of us. Keep in mind this is virtually the same team as last year, success will come once we become comfortable with who does what. And I trust Beilein 100% to get it done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I might be overstating the obvious, but worrying about the national tournament implications of a preseason tournament I believe to be a little premature.</p>
<p>I agree with Tweeter re: man. Especially against Marquette, it was obvious that we&#8217;re simply either not athletic enough, or aren&#8217;t good enough defenders (yet) to play a considerable amount of man. The 1-3-1&#8242;s vulnerability is along the free throw line extended, which opens up the baseline. This problem is solved by better rotation and help defense, it is not simply the &#8220;magic way&#8221; to break the 1-3-1.</p>
<p>I take a few positives about this weekend. One: these problems occurred all within the first five games of the season. Two: John Beilein as a head coach will have the film dissected and immediately begin addressing problems, including ones we can&#8217;t even conceive of ASAP.</p>
<p>I believe that we just need to find our rhythm and our roles. We&#8217;ve got a great head coach, we&#8217;ve got great players, we&#8217;ve got the entire season in front of us. Keep in mind this is virtually the same team as last year, success will come once we become comfortable with who does what. And I trust Beilein 100% to get it done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.umhoops.com/2009/11/29/game-5-michigan-vs-alabama-post-game/comment-page-1/#comment-19643</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 20:44:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umhoops.com/?p=5908#comment-19643</guid>
		<description>Sorry, but this season was not about sneaking into the NCAA dance.

This was supposed to be an enjoyable 20-22 team that cruised into the NCAAs with a solid seed and a chance to advance to the second weekend.

One of the things I was looking forward to this season? Being ranked. To drop out of the rankings so soon is very discouraging.

UM basketball won some converts last year. But we have a fragile following. A #19 or #20 ranked UM team would have drawn some fans -- but now an unranked UM team against Coppin State or Pine Bluff is going to play before empty seats.

And we looked awful at Old Spice. Unless we turn it around fast, this team is going to have a major struggle to reach the NCAA tournament.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, but this season was not about sneaking into the NCAA dance.</p>
<p>This was supposed to be an enjoyable 20-22 team that cruised into the NCAAs with a solid seed and a chance to advance to the second weekend.</p>
<p>One of the things I was looking forward to this season? Being ranked. To drop out of the rankings so soon is very discouraging.</p>
<p>UM basketball won some converts last year. But we have a fragile following. A #19 or #20 ranked UM team would have drawn some fans &#8212; but now an unranked UM team against Coppin State or Pine Bluff is going to play before empty seats.</p>
<p>And we looked awful at Old Spice. Unless we turn it around fast, this team is going to have a major struggle to reach the NCAA tournament.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://www.umhoops.com/2009/11/29/game-5-michigan-vs-alabama-post-game/comment-page-1/#comment-19642</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 19:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umhoops.com/?p=5908#comment-19642</guid>
		<description>i agree with the person talking of manny lack of good decision in shooting 3s in some cases........he takes bad shots sometimes and really does more damage............i also agree especially that gibson needs to play more, he has been an animal and his FG% has to be like 80% right now definitely needs more mins and vogrich needs to be getting at least 5 3pt attempts a game</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i agree with the person talking of manny lack of good decision in shooting 3s in some cases&#8230;&#8230;..he takes bad shots sometimes and really does more damage&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;i also agree especially that gibson needs to play more, he has been an animal and his FG% has to be like 80% right now definitely needs more mins and vogrich needs to be getting at least 5 3pt attempts a game</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bball</title>
		<link>http://www.umhoops.com/2009/11/29/game-5-michigan-vs-alabama-post-game/comment-page-1/#comment-19641</link>
		<dc:creator>Bball</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 19:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umhoops.com/?p=5908#comment-19641</guid>
		<description>Lots of good commentary here!

I&#039;ve been mainly frustrated with the lack of intensity, but still remain very optimistic on the season.  How?  I keep in mind the following:

The last games we watched were end of the season tournament games - rust is an issue right now for sure

The ceiling of this team still seems much higher than last year

The floor of this team (which I think we witnessed over the weekend) still has opportunities to win against average quality opponents playing above their head.

Lessons from last year:
Stu&#039;s defense improved tremendously over the course of the year - LLP needs to have this same progression.  His body position is horrible right now (bent at the waist, weight on his heels, etc, needs to get his butt down and weight over the balls of his feet) and increase focus.  LLP is really hurting us on D at the bottom of the 1-3-1 as well.  He needs to improve for team defense to improve.  I have faith he will get this done.  Darius will improve on the defensive end as the year goes on as well.

Novak&#039;s role, and really the whole rotation, wasn&#039;t established until midway through the big ten last year.  I think we will see continued tinkering and additional contributions from the freshman as the year continues.

Free throw shooting will come around.

We are a better 3-point shooting team than we have shown (part of this is Manny/stu busting slumps and part is wright/gibson/peedi not shooting any - or at least very few).  If the team can make 10 threes a game, they will be extremely tough to beat. Where do they come from? One to three makes from any of Manny, Stu, Novak, LLP, Vogrich

Our point guard is a Freshman - as the year progresses, Darius is going to gain confidence and be able to contribute more and more.  I think Manny will essentially need to play point-forward in terms of floor direction though, and he needs to step up that part of his game for sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lots of good commentary here!</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been mainly frustrated with the lack of intensity, but still remain very optimistic on the season.  How?  I keep in mind the following:</p>
<p>The last games we watched were end of the season tournament games &#8211; rust is an issue right now for sure</p>
<p>The ceiling of this team still seems much higher than last year</p>
<p>The floor of this team (which I think we witnessed over the weekend) still has opportunities to win against average quality opponents playing above their head.</p>
<p>Lessons from last year:<br />
Stu&#8217;s defense improved tremendously over the course of the year &#8211; LLP needs to have this same progression.  His body position is horrible right now (bent at the waist, weight on his heels, etc, needs to get his butt down and weight over the balls of his feet) and increase focus.  LLP is really hurting us on D at the bottom of the 1-3-1 as well.  He needs to improve for team defense to improve.  I have faith he will get this done.  Darius will improve on the defensive end as the year goes on as well.</p>
<p>Novak&#8217;s role, and really the whole rotation, wasn&#8217;t established until midway through the big ten last year.  I think we will see continued tinkering and additional contributions from the freshman as the year continues.</p>
<p>Free throw shooting will come around.</p>
<p>We are a better 3-point shooting team than we have shown (part of this is Manny/stu busting slumps and part is wright/gibson/peedi not shooting any &#8211; or at least very few).  If the team can make 10 threes a game, they will be extremely tough to beat. Where do they come from? One to three makes from any of Manny, Stu, Novak, LLP, Vogrich</p>
<p>Our point guard is a Freshman &#8211; as the year progresses, Darius is going to gain confidence and be able to contribute more and more.  I think Manny will essentially need to play point-forward in terms of floor direction though, and he needs to step up that part of his game for sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duffy</title>
		<link>http://www.umhoops.com/2009/11/29/game-5-michigan-vs-alabama-post-game/comment-page-1/#comment-19640</link>
		<dc:creator>Duffy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 17:15:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umhoops.com/?p=5908#comment-19640</guid>
		<description>Not to get down on our best player, but we seem maybe too &quot;Mannycentric&quot;. It seemed like every game someone would pass to him beyond the 3 point line, he would hesitate, and then take the shot instead of shooting it in rhythm, usually missing. Also there seemed to be several times he was driving to the basket when there was someone wide open that he never passed to, and his free throw shooting was pretty poor.

Not to say it was all his fault, he was still our best player in all the games, Darius certainly struggled, his layups were not going in, Gibson seems to play well but can only get out on the floor for 10 minutes at most, wright is streaky, Sims just seems to disappear for long stretches, Novak is undersized and the 3 pointers just were not falling for the team as a whole.

We&#039;ll see if the team can react and get it turned around or not, they have a lot of work to do though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to get down on our best player, but we seem maybe too &#8220;Mannycentric&#8221;. It seemed like every game someone would pass to him beyond the 3 point line, he would hesitate, and then take the shot instead of shooting it in rhythm, usually missing. Also there seemed to be several times he was driving to the basket when there was someone wide open that he never passed to, and his free throw shooting was pretty poor.</p>
<p>Not to say it was all his fault, he was still our best player in all the games, Darius certainly struggled, his layups were not going in, Gibson seems to play well but can only get out on the floor for 10 minutes at most, wright is streaky, Sims just seems to disappear for long stretches, Novak is undersized and the 3 pointers just were not falling for the team as a whole.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ll see if the team can react and get it turned around or not, they have a lot of work to do though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.umhoops.com/2009/11/29/game-5-michigan-vs-alabama-post-game/comment-page-1/#comment-19639</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 17:05:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umhoops.com/?p=5908#comment-19639</guid>
		<description>Vogrich and Gibson NEED to play more every time they&#039;re in the game we go on runs - ie against Marquette tied game back up w Vogrich 3 and Gibson buckets and went on 10-1 run against bama these two aren&#039;t getting a chance</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vogrich and Gibson NEED to play more every time they&#8217;re in the game we go on runs &#8211; ie against Marquette tied game back up w Vogrich 3 and Gibson buckets and went on 10-1 run against bama these two aren&#8217;t getting a chance</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://www.umhoops.com/2009/11/29/game-5-michigan-vs-alabama-post-game/comment-page-1/#comment-19638</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 16:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umhoops.com/?p=5908#comment-19638</guid>
		<description>The problem is not that we are shooting to many threes, its the fact we aren&#039;t making and threes. The marquette game we only shot 20. The problem is we only made three.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem is not that we are shooting to many threes, its the fact we aren&#8217;t making and threes. The marquette game we only shot 20. The problem is we only made three.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

