<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Schedule Update: Conference Games Set</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.umhoops.com/2009/07/23/schedule-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.umhoops.com/2009/07/23/schedule-update/</link>
	<description>Michigan Basketball News, Recruiting, and Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 03:53:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcus</title>
		<link>http://www.umhoops.com/2009/07/23/schedule-update/comment-page-1/#comment-17077</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 03:41:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umhoops.com/?p=4165#comment-17077</guid>
		<description>LETS GO BLUE!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LETS GO BLUE!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://www.umhoops.com/2009/07/23/schedule-update/comment-page-1/#comment-17076</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 20:05:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umhoops.com/?p=4165#comment-17076</guid>
		<description>I hate the &quot;one plays&quot; in the Big 10 schedule.  I wish they would go back to a full home and away round robin schedule like they had before the introduction of the Big 10 tournament.  Give up two meaningless pre-season games and make the regular season a fair assessment of which is the best team in the league.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate the &#8220;one plays&#8221; in the Big 10 schedule.  I wish they would go back to a full home and away round robin schedule like they had before the introduction of the Big 10 tournament.  Give up two meaningless pre-season games and make the regular season a fair assessment of which is the best team in the league.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aMaized</title>
		<link>http://www.umhoops.com/2009/07/23/schedule-update/comment-page-1/#comment-17075</link>
		<dc:creator>aMaized</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 22:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umhoops.com/?p=4165#comment-17075</guid>
		<description>http://rivals.yahoo.com/ncaa/basketball/news;_ylt=AnL50km6Irw7S.pelB6RbNfevbYF?slug=jn-hooprisers072409&amp;prov=yhoo&amp;type=lgns</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://rivals.yahoo.com/ncaa/basketball/news;_ylt=AnL50km6Irw7S.pelB6RbNfevbYF?slug=jn-hooprisers072409&#038;prov=yhoo&#038;type=lgns" rel="nofollow">http://rivals.yahoo.com/ncaa/basketball/news;_ylt=AnL50km6Irw7S.pelB6RbNfevbYF?slug=jn-hooprisers072409&#038;prov=yhoo&#038;type=lgns</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jmblue</title>
		<link>http://www.umhoops.com/2009/07/23/schedule-update/comment-page-1/#comment-17074</link>
		<dc:creator>jmblue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 19:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umhoops.com/?p=4165#comment-17074</guid>
		<description>Old Style - mgoblog.com is terrific.  Brian (the host) breaks down every single play from each game.  He&#039;s also a very good writer and can be hilarious to read.

I don&#039;t think we need to worry about our conference strength of schedule.  First, the conference&#039;s RPI is going to be through the roof no matter what - we may well see 10 of the 11 teams go to at least the NIT.  Second, our nonconference schedule is stacked, so we&#039;re pretty covered either way.  Anyway, we shouldn&#039;t be in a position where we&#039;re sweating it out on Selection Sunday next year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Old Style &#8211; mgoblog.com is terrific.  Brian (the host) breaks down every single play from each game.  He&#8217;s also a very good writer and can be hilarious to read.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think we need to worry about our conference strength of schedule.  First, the conference&#8217;s RPI is going to be through the roof no matter what &#8211; we may well see 10 of the 11 teams go to at least the NIT.  Second, our nonconference schedule is stacked, so we&#8217;re pretty covered either way.  Anyway, we shouldn&#8217;t be in a position where we&#8217;re sweating it out on Selection Sunday next year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Old Style</title>
		<link>http://www.umhoops.com/2009/07/23/schedule-update/comment-page-1/#comment-17073</link>
		<dc:creator>Old Style</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 18:46:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umhoops.com/?p=4165#comment-17073</guid>
		<description>Dylan, totally unrelated but I was wondering if you could recommend a Michigan football website.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dylan, totally unrelated but I was wondering if you could recommend a Michigan football website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: El Capitan</title>
		<link>http://www.umhoops.com/2009/07/23/schedule-update/comment-page-1/#comment-17072</link>
		<dc:creator>El Capitan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 02:49:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umhoops.com/?p=4165#comment-17072</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m just glad that we get another crack at sPARTY at Crisler... there is simply no way they are winning here next season</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m just glad that we get another crack at sPARTY at Crisler&#8230; there is simply no way they are winning here next season</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JBlair52</title>
		<link>http://www.umhoops.com/2009/07/23/schedule-update/comment-page-1/#comment-17071</link>
		<dc:creator>JBlair52</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 21:34:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umhoops.com/?p=4165#comment-17071</guid>
		<description>interesting thoughts

But the way I figure - our Strength of Schedule is going to be pretty tough no matter what 2 games we miss.

Last year it was pretty tough and we missed MSU.

Xavier, Marquette, Alabama, Boston College, Utah, Connecticut, Kansas, Michigan State (2), Purdue, Illinois, Ohio State (2)

that could very well be what our schedule looks like...and i&#039;m not even including some of the other big ten teams.  (obviously the old spice isnt set but it could easily be something similar)

so yeah - not too worried about the strength of schedule.

actually, we could probably use a &quot;SLIGHT&quot; break IMO.  And we&#039;ll have our shot to get some wins in the Big Ten - which is going to be a loaded conference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>interesting thoughts</p>
<p>But the way I figure &#8211; our Strength of Schedule is going to be pretty tough no matter what 2 games we miss.</p>
<p>Last year it was pretty tough and we missed MSU.</p>
<p>Xavier, Marquette, Alabama, Boston College, Utah, Connecticut, Kansas, Michigan State (2), Purdue, Illinois, Ohio State (2)</p>
<p>that could very well be what our schedule looks like&#8230;and i&#8217;m not even including some of the other big ten teams.  (obviously the old spice isnt set but it could easily be something similar)</p>
<p>so yeah &#8211; not too worried about the strength of schedule.</p>
<p>actually, we could probably use a &#8220;SLIGHT&#8221; break IMO.  And we&#8217;ll have our shot to get some wins in the Big Ten &#8211; which is going to be a loaded conference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.umhoops.com/2009/07/23/schedule-update/comment-page-1/#comment-17070</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 20:26:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umhoops.com/?p=4165#comment-17070</guid>
		<description>Perhaps a new spin on missing out on Purdue and Illinois:  Not only will we miss out on an opportunity to notch 2 additional quality wins, but not playing Illinois and Purdue also puts greater pressure on us to win @PSU, @NW, @Iowa, and @Indiana which has been very tough for us to accomplish (2 OT wins and 2 Ls last year).  Even though we know that the Big Ten will be very competitive top-to-bottom this year, a loss at one of the 4 aforementioned venues would probably look a lot worse than a loss at home to Purdue/Illinois would.

That said, I see no reason why we shouldn&#039;t win 10-12 games in conference this season and (hopefully) rest a bit easier on Selection Sunday.  GO BLUE!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps a new spin on missing out on Purdue and Illinois:  Not only will we miss out on an opportunity to notch 2 additional quality wins, but not playing Illinois and Purdue also puts greater pressure on us to win @PSU, @NW, @Iowa, and @Indiana which has been very tough for us to accomplish (2 OT wins and 2 Ls last year).  Even though we know that the Big Ten will be very competitive top-to-bottom this year, a loss at one of the 4 aforementioned venues would probably look a lot worse than a loss at home to Purdue/Illinois would.</p>
<p>That said, I see no reason why we shouldn&#8217;t win 10-12 games in conference this season and (hopefully) rest a bit easier on Selection Sunday.  GO BLUE!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.umhoops.com/2009/07/23/schedule-update/comment-page-1/#comment-17069</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 20:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umhoops.com/?p=4165#comment-17069</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know if I like that we are not playing Illinois and Purdue twice. I&#039;d rather play them and get more tune-up games for the tourney. Playing Indiana twice and Iowa twice does nothing for our schedule strength but make it lower. I mean I guess Iowa could be a pretty good team next year but I really dont think so. All I know is the Big Ten is gonna be stacked next year and I could definitely see 8 teams from the Big Ten making the tourney. In a lot of preseason polls I&#039;ve seen 5 to 6 teams from the Big Ten in them: UM, MSU, Minn, Ohio State, Illinois and Purdue. Wisconsin, Penn State and Northwestern will be good teams and all I know is Beilein better have our boys ready to play.

GO BLUE</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know if I like that we are not playing Illinois and Purdue twice. I&#8217;d rather play them and get more tune-up games for the tourney. Playing Indiana twice and Iowa twice does nothing for our schedule strength but make it lower. I mean I guess Iowa could be a pretty good team next year but I really dont think so. All I know is the Big Ten is gonna be stacked next year and I could definitely see 8 teams from the Big Ten making the tourney. In a lot of preseason polls I&#8217;ve seen 5 to 6 teams from the Big Ten in them: UM, MSU, Minn, Ohio State, Illinois and Purdue. Wisconsin, Penn State and Northwestern will be good teams and all I know is Beilein better have our boys ready to play.</p>
<p>GO BLUE</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hambone</title>
		<link>http://www.umhoops.com/2009/07/23/schedule-update/comment-page-1/#comment-17068</link>
		<dc:creator>hambone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 17:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umhoops.com/?p=4165#comment-17068</guid>
		<description>remember though, that we only had to play MSU once this past season (at home nonetheless), which may have also been a good break for us last season... this year we&#039;ll be playing msu twice...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>remember though, that we only had to play MSU once this past season (at home nonetheless), which may have also been a good break for us last season&#8230; this year we&#8217;ll be playing msu twice&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

