<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2009 Big Ten Tournament Bracket</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.umhoops.com/2009/03/08/big-ten-tournament-bracket/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.umhoops.com/2009/03/08/big-ten-tournament-bracket/</link>
	<description>Michigan Basketball News, Recruiting, and Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 03:53:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Game 30: Michigan at Michigan State Post Game &#124; UM Hoops.com</title>
		<link>http://www.umhoops.com/2009/03/08/big-ten-tournament-bracket/comment-page-1/#comment-13493</link>
		<dc:creator>Game 30: Michigan at Michigan State Post Game &#124; UM Hoops.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 15:52:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umhoops.com/?p=2490#comment-13493</guid>
		<description>[...] PM ESPN2). This is the third year in a row that Michigan has played Iowa in the first round of the Big Ten tournament. Michigan won both games in Indianapolis and is 2-0 versus Iowa this year. Full Big Ten Tournament [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] PM ESPN2). This is the third year in a row that Michigan has played Iowa in the first round of the Big Ten tournament. Michigan won both games in Indianapolis and is 2-0 versus Iowa this year. Full Big Ten Tournament [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jpizzle</title>
		<link>http://www.umhoops.com/2009/03/08/big-ten-tournament-bracket/comment-page-1/#comment-13492</link>
		<dc:creator>jpizzle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 15:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umhoops.com/?p=2490#comment-13492</guid>
		<description>The one guy towards the top is a DOUCHE BAG if he thinks Michigan can beat Illinois.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The one guy towards the top is a DOUCHE BAG if he thinks Michigan can beat Illinois.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cooper</title>
		<link>http://www.umhoops.com/2009/03/08/big-ten-tournament-bracket/comment-page-1/#comment-13491</link>
		<dc:creator>Cooper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 23:31:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umhoops.com/?p=2490#comment-13491</guid>
		<description>UM certainly took a lucky break with this draw, especially in staying as far away from big brother MSU as possible.  I&#039;d like to see UM go dancing this year.  They&#039;ll face a tough game in round one if they do, but . . . I guess anything can happen in March!  I just hope they play one game at a time, try not to get overconfident, and take a note from the boys up the road in the East Lansing.  The Spartans seem to have perfected the art of the tournament, and UM would benefit by following their example of a consistent blue-collar attitude, selfless basketball, and playing with heart.

Welcome to March boys, and Go Big Ten!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UM certainly took a lucky break with this draw, especially in staying as far away from big brother MSU as possible.  I&#8217;d like to see UM go dancing this year.  They&#8217;ll face a tough game in round one if they do, but . . . I guess anything can happen in March!  I just hope they play one game at a time, try not to get overconfident, and take a note from the boys up the road in the East Lansing.  The Spartans seem to have perfected the art of the tournament, and UM would benefit by following their example of a consistent blue-collar attitude, selfless basketball, and playing with heart.</p>
<p>Welcome to March boys, and Go Big Ten!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steveo</title>
		<link>http://www.umhoops.com/2009/03/08/big-ten-tournament-bracket/comment-page-1/#comment-13490</link>
		<dc:creator>steveo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 18:40:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umhoops.com/?p=2490#comment-13490</guid>
		<description>Like everyone has said, this will be a very exciting BTT. I expect UM to beat Iowa, but we need to play well. We don&#039;t need to have a game like Purdue, just another effort like the one against Minnesota. A good solid basketball game. Make enough threes and limit the turnovers. And for God&#039;s sake, cover Jake Kelly! I like UM over Iowa, just don&#039;t be overconfident.

Go Blue!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like everyone has said, this will be a very exciting BTT. I expect UM to beat Iowa, but we need to play well. We don&#8217;t need to have a game like Purdue, just another effort like the one against Minnesota. A good solid basketball game. Make enough threes and limit the turnovers. And for God&#8217;s sake, cover Jake Kelly! I like UM over Iowa, just don&#8217;t be overconfident.</p>
<p>Go Blue!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JimC</title>
		<link>http://www.umhoops.com/2009/03/08/big-ten-tournament-bracket/comment-page-1/#comment-13489</link>
		<dc:creator>JimC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 18:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umhoops.com/?p=2490#comment-13489</guid>
		<description>El Capitan, good question above...

Cyrus Tate played 42 mins vs PSU Saturday.  He made 7 of 9 shots for 15 points, and had 10 Rebs.

NO ONE SHOULD TAKE IOWA LIGHTLY.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>El Capitan, good question above&#8230;</p>
<p>Cyrus Tate played 42 mins vs PSU Saturday.  He made 7 of 9 shots for 15 points, and had 10 Rebs.</p>
<p>NO ONE SHOULD TAKE IOWA LIGHTLY.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kenny</title>
		<link>http://www.umhoops.com/2009/03/08/big-ten-tournament-bracket/comment-page-1/#comment-13488</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 17:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umhoops.com/?p=2490#comment-13488</guid>
		<description>very exciting time! This is the most anticipating BTT ever with so many good teams from top to bottom. Almost every game is a toss up.

Most write M in already but beating Iowa will lock it.
Penn State needs to beat Indiana for the least.
Minnesota needs a win over NW.
NW needs a win over Minnesota and a win over the Sparty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very exciting time! This is the most anticipating BTT ever with so many good teams from top to bottom. Almost every game is a toss up.</p>
<p>Most write M in already but beating Iowa will lock it.<br />
Penn State needs to beat Indiana for the least.<br />
Minnesota needs a win over NW.<br />
NW needs a win over Minnesota and a win over the Sparty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drew</title>
		<link>http://www.umhoops.com/2009/03/08/big-ten-tournament-bracket/comment-page-1/#comment-13487</link>
		<dc:creator>Drew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 16:36:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umhoops.com/?p=2490#comment-13487</guid>
		<description>As stated by some of you, Penn State is not even close to a lock.  I think they are more on the bubble than Minny, who would I consider in the &quot;likely&quot; range.  If Minny beats NW, I believe their in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As stated by some of you, Penn State is not even close to a lock.  I think they are more on the bubble than Minny, who would I consider in the &#8220;likely&#8221; range.  If Minny beats NW, I believe their in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raiderfan</title>
		<link>http://www.umhoops.com/2009/03/08/big-ten-tournament-bracket/comment-page-1/#comment-13486</link>
		<dc:creator>raiderfan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 16:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umhoops.com/?p=2490#comment-13486</guid>
		<description>Warren Nolan is a moron.  Take a look at Bracketology 101.  They had the highest percentage rate of any site predicting the field last year.  And yes, we are in.

http://bracketology101.blogspot.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Warren Nolan is a moron.  Take a look at Bracketology 101.  They had the highest percentage rate of any site predicting the field last year.  And yes, we are in.</p>
<p><a href="http://bracketology101.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://bracketology101.blogspot.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Avery Queen</title>
		<link>http://www.umhoops.com/2009/03/08/big-ten-tournament-bracket/comment-page-1/#comment-13485</link>
		<dc:creator>Avery Queen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 16:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umhoops.com/?p=2490#comment-13485</guid>
		<description>i know it shows a post for march 9th, but the records aren&#039;t updated (at least ours and minnesotas)

and psu is really in an unfortunate spot. a win vs. iu is almost meaningless which means they really could use a win over purdue. i bet they wish they were actually seeded worse so they could play a game where a win would actually help them and vs. an opponent not as good as purdue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i know it shows a post for march 9th, but the records aren&#8217;t updated (at least ours and minnesotas)</p>
<p>and psu is really in an unfortunate spot. a win vs. iu is almost meaningless which means they really could use a win over purdue. i bet they wish they were actually seeded worse so they could play a game where a win would actually help them and vs. an opponent not as good as purdue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.umhoops.com/2009/03/08/big-ten-tournament-bracket/comment-page-1/#comment-13484</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 15:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umhoops.com/?p=2490#comment-13484</guid>
		<description>I agree that the &quot;fullysports&quot; projection is almost completely non-sensical.  If you look at the numbers there&#039;s no way K-State, Florida, or Minnesota should be in over UM.  UM has a better RPI, SOS, and last 10 then K-State and Florida and has a practically idential resume to Minnesota, except that they beat them twice.  Honestly just looks like low quality work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that the &#8220;fullysports&#8221; projection is almost completely non-sensical.  If you look at the numbers there&#8217;s no way K-State, Florida, or Minnesota should be in over UM.  UM has a better RPI, SOS, and last 10 then K-State and Florida and has a practically idential resume to Minnesota, except that they beat them twice.  Honestly just looks like low quality work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

