<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wednesday Notes &amp; Links</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.umhoops.com/2009/03/04/wednesday-notes-links-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.umhoops.com/2009/03/04/wednesday-notes-links-2/</link>
	<description>Michigan Basketball News, Recruiting, and Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 03:53:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: rlc</title>
		<link>http://www.umhoops.com/2009/03/04/wednesday-notes-links-2/comment-page-2/#comment-12784</link>
		<dc:creator>rlc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 00:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umhoops.com/?p=2349#comment-12784</guid>
		<description>Oh, they&#039;d be 5,6,7,8 seeds in that scenario...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, they&#8217;d be 5,6,7,8 seeds in that scenario&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rlc</title>
		<link>http://www.umhoops.com/2009/03/04/wednesday-notes-links-2/comment-page-2/#comment-12783</link>
		<dc:creator>rlc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 00:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umhoops.com/?p=2349#comment-12783</guid>
		<description>OK, one more possibility:

Four way tie
Wisconsin 9-9 4-2
Michigan 9-9 3-3 (1-1 v UI)
Minnesota 9-9 3-3
Penn St. 9-9  2-4</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, one more possibility:</p>
<p>Four way tie<br />
Wisconsin 9-9 4-2<br />
Michigan 9-9 3-3 (1-1 v UI)<br />
Minnesota 9-9 3-3<br />
Penn St. 9-9  2-4</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Giddings</title>
		<link>http://www.umhoops.com/2009/03/04/wednesday-notes-links-2/comment-page-2/#comment-12782</link>
		<dc:creator>Giddings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 17:53:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umhoops.com/?p=2349#comment-12782</guid>
		<description>Lunardi says Michigan has moved into the field for now: http://insider.espn.go.com/espn/blog/index?entryID=3954548&amp;name=ncbexperts

Katz makes the case for Northwestern (6 Top 50 wins!): http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/blog/index?entryID=3953853&amp;name=katz_andy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lunardi says Michigan has moved into the field for now: <a href="http://insider.espn.go.com/espn/blog/index?entryID=3954548&#038;name=ncbexperts" rel="nofollow">http://insider.espn.go.com/espn/blog/index?entryID=3954548&#038;name=ncbexperts</a></p>
<p>Katz makes the case for Northwestern (6 Top 50 wins!): <a href="http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/blog/index?entryID=3953853&#038;name=katz_andy" rel="nofollow">http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/blog/index?entryID=3953853&#038;name=katz_andy</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Giddings</title>
		<link>http://www.umhoops.com/2009/03/04/wednesday-notes-links-2/comment-page-2/#comment-12781</link>
		<dc:creator>Giddings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 17:34:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umhoops.com/?p=2349#comment-12781</guid>
		<description>UMQuasi, the default &quot;tiebreaker&quot; for those sites is Overall Win/Loss Percentage, which NW edges us slightly on at 17-11 instead of 18-12 (by less than 1%).  It has nothing to do with seeding for the BTT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UMQuasi, the default &#8220;tiebreaker&#8221; for those sites is Overall Win/Loss Percentage, which NW edges us slightly on at 17-11 instead of 18-12 (by less than 1%).  It has nothing to do with seeding for the BTT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UMQuasi</title>
		<link>http://www.umhoops.com/2009/03/04/wednesday-notes-links-2/comment-page-2/#comment-12780</link>
		<dc:creator>UMQuasi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 16:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umhoops.com/?p=2349#comment-12780</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m confused now, both ESPN and the Big Ten Network shows Northwestern above us in the standings.  According to all of these posts, we have the tiebreaker over them</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m confused now, both ESPN and the Big Ten Network shows Northwestern above us in the standings.  According to all of these posts, we have the tiebreaker over them</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gpsimms</title>
		<link>http://www.umhoops.com/2009/03/04/wednesday-notes-links-2/comment-page-2/#comment-12779</link>
		<dc:creator>gpsimms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 15:28:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umhoops.com/?p=2349#comment-12779</guid>
		<description>read through the comments, ryan.  your question has been answered/linked in exhaustive detail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>read through the comments, ryan.  your question has been answered/linked in exhaustive detail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.umhoops.com/2009/03/04/wednesday-notes-links-2/comment-page-2/#comment-12778</link>
		<dc:creator>ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 15:23:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umhoops.com/?p=2349#comment-12778</guid>
		<description>how do those tie breakers work? I know for a two way tie it is head to head matchups but what is it after that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how do those tie breakers work? I know for a two way tie it is head to head matchups but what is it after that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JimC</title>
		<link>http://www.umhoops.com/2009/03/04/wednesday-notes-links-2/comment-page-2/#comment-12777</link>
		<dc:creator>JimC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 11:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umhoops.com/?p=2349#comment-12777</guid>
		<description>Man I hope all these predictions are not in vain.  I&#039;m still pretty worried about Saturday, still thinking if we lose that we&#039;re out.  MN is solid, and rested or not, the barn is one of the hardest places to play.
Prove me wrong M!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man I hope all these predictions are not in vain.  I&#8217;m still pretty worried about Saturday, still thinking if we lose that we&#8217;re out.  MN is solid, and rested or not, the barn is one of the hardest places to play.<br />
Prove me wrong M!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rlc</title>
		<link>http://www.umhoops.com/2009/03/04/wednesday-notes-links-2/comment-page-2/#comment-12776</link>
		<dc:creator>rlc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 07:07:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umhoops.com/?p=2349#comment-12776</guid>
		<description>Oh, that&#039;s right. Here are those:

Three way tie
6 Michigan 9-9 2-2 (1-1 v PU)
7 Wisconsin 9-9 2-2 (2-0 v PSU 1-0 v OSU)
8 Minnesota 9-9 2-2 (1-1 v PSU 1-1 v OSU)

Five way tie
5 Wisconsin 9-9 4-3
6 Northwestern 9-9 4-4 (1-1 v MSU)
7 Michigan 9-9 4-4 (1-1 v PU)
8 Minnesota 9-9 4-4
9 Ohio St. 9-9 3-4</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, that&#8217;s right. Here are those:</p>
<p>Three way tie<br />
6 Michigan 9-9 2-2 (1-1 v PU)<br />
7 Wisconsin 9-9 2-2 (2-0 v PSU 1-0 v OSU)<br />
8 Minnesota 9-9 2-2 (1-1 v PSU 1-1 v OSU)</p>
<p>Five way tie<br />
5 Wisconsin 9-9 4-3<br />
6 Northwestern 9-9 4-4 (1-1 v MSU)<br />
7 Michigan 9-9 4-4 (1-1 v PU)<br />
8 Minnesota 9-9 4-4<br />
9 Ohio St. 9-9 3-4</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Redwings8831</title>
		<link>http://www.umhoops.com/2009/03/04/wednesday-notes-links-2/comment-page-2/#comment-12775</link>
		<dc:creator>Redwings8831</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 06:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umhoops.com/?p=2349#comment-12775</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve thought about a couple more, but don&#039;t feel like going through them now. Like a 3 or 5 way tie which would include Wisconsin instead of Penn State. There might be a couple more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve thought about a couple more, but don&#8217;t feel like going through them now. Like a 3 or 5 way tie which would include Wisconsin instead of Penn State. There might be a couple more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

