<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Adidas Uniforms</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.umhoops.com/2008/09/30/adidas-uniforms/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.umhoops.com/2008/09/30/adidas-uniforms/</link>
	<description>An Unofficial University of Michigan Basketball Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 08:56:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Musket Rebellion</title>
		<link>http://www.umhoops.com/2008/09/30/adidas-uniforms/comment-page-1/#comment-6312</link>
		<dc:creator>Musket Rebellion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 01:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umhoops.com/?p=440#comment-6312</guid>
		<description>http://bentley.umich.edu/athdept/baskmen/baskmaa/robinsaa.htm

So spicy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://bentley.umich.edu/athdept/baskmen/baskmaa/robinsaa.htm" rel="nofollow">http://bentley.umich.edu/athde.....binsaa.htm</a></p>
<p>So spicy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.umhoops.com/2008/09/30/adidas-uniforms/comment-page-1/#comment-6302</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 22:56:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umhoops.com/?p=440#comment-6302</guid>
		<description>The BIG block M on the shorts needs to come back.  I am impressed.  I like that there is no adidas logo under the crew neck, I find that to be a little distracting on the football jerseys.  The nike swoosh symbol is just a little more unassuming than the three stripes with the word adidas under it.  

Anyone else think the football jerseys bunch up weird once the game starts going?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The BIG block M on the shorts needs to come back.  I am impressed.  I like that there is no adidas logo under the crew neck, I find that to be a little distracting on the football jerseys.  The nike swoosh symbol is just a little more unassuming than the three stripes with the word adidas under it.  </p>
<p>Anyone else think the football jerseys bunch up weird once the game starts going?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Musket Rebellion</title>
		<link>http://www.umhoops.com/2008/09/30/adidas-uniforms/comment-page-1/#comment-6298</link>
		<dc:creator>Musket Rebellion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 22:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umhoops.com/?p=440#comment-6298</guid>
		<description>The 89 NC unis are absolute relics. I remember being 5, sitting with my dad watching the dance that year not knowing what was going on, but just knowing that my dad was happy so I was too. Outside of Jalen Rose Rumeal Robinson is probably my favorite M baller. The huge block M from the shorts from the Fab Five days are only awesome with black Nikes and black socks pulled up to the knees. Although it Morris wanted to substitute all black Adidas when he gets on campus I&#039;d be all for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 89 NC unis are absolute relics. I remember being 5, sitting with my dad watching the dance that year not knowing what was going on, but just knowing that my dad was happy so I was too. Outside of Jalen Rose Rumeal Robinson is probably my favorite M baller. The huge block M from the shorts from the Fab Five days are only awesome with black Nikes and black socks pulled up to the knees. Although it Morris wanted to substitute all black Adidas when he gets on campus I&#8217;d be all for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brick</title>
		<link>http://www.umhoops.com/2008/09/30/adidas-uniforms/comment-page-1/#comment-6290</link>
		<dc:creator>Brick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 20:35:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umhoops.com/?p=440#comment-6290</guid>
		<description>My bet is that Puls will play this year.  He has been mentioned a few times by Beilein and we are thin in the post.  There won&#039;t be any major minutes unless someone gets injured but he will probably play a few minutes a game especially if someone gets in foul trouble.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My bet is that Puls will play this year.  He has been mentioned a few times by Beilein and we are thin in the post.  There won&#8217;t be any major minutes unless someone gets injured but he will probably play a few minutes a game especially if someone gets in foul trouble.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mason</title>
		<link>http://www.umhoops.com/2008/09/30/adidas-uniforms/comment-page-1/#comment-6287</link>
		<dc:creator>Mason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 19:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umhoops.com/?p=440#comment-6287</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve always loved the &#039;89 unis. It&#039;d be awesome if we were to wear those throwbacks against MSU or something...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve always loved the &#8216;89 unis. It&#8217;d be awesome if we were to wear those throwbacks against MSU or something&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.umhoops.com/2008/09/30/adidas-uniforms/comment-page-1/#comment-6284</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 18:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umhoops.com/?p=440#comment-6284</guid>
		<description>Will Mr. Puls play at all this year?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will Mr. Puls play at all this year?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wolverine</title>
		<link>http://www.umhoops.com/2008/09/30/adidas-uniforms/comment-page-1/#comment-6274</link>
		<dc:creator>Wolverine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 18:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umhoops.com/?p=440#comment-6274</guid>
		<description>FINALLY!!!!  SOMEONE ELSE WHO SHARES MY VIEWS/TASTES REGARDING MICHIGAN MEN&#039;S BASKETBALL UNIFORMS!!!!  The &quot;I still favor the Fab Five era or the 89 NC unis . . .&quot; Comment from *Musket Rebellion*.  In other words I agree entirely with what *Musket Rebellion* said!!!!

--WOLVERINE</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FINALLY!!!!  SOMEONE ELSE WHO SHARES MY VIEWS/TASTES REGARDING MICHIGAN MEN&#8217;S BASKETBALL UNIFORMS!!!!  The &#8220;I still favor the Fab Five era or the 89 NC unis . . .&#8221; Comment from *Musket Rebellion*.  In other words I agree entirely with what *Musket Rebellion* said!!!!</p>
<p>&#8211;WOLVERINE</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://www.umhoops.com/2008/09/30/adidas-uniforms/comment-page-1/#comment-6270</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 18:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umhoops.com/?p=440#comment-6270</guid>
		<description>They look really white. Not the unis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They look really white. Not the unis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Musket Rebellion</title>
		<link>http://www.umhoops.com/2008/09/30/adidas-uniforms/comment-page-1/#comment-6269</link>
		<dc:creator>Musket Rebellion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 17:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umhoops.com/?p=440#comment-6269</guid>
		<description>The new unis look sharp. I still favor the Fab Five era or the 89 NC unis, but these are nice. Agreed with everyone above that we need to keep the Maize unis in the fold. All in all Adidas has done well with the new gear. The football jerseys look pretty sharp and the new hockey jerseys are awesome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new unis look sharp. I still favor the Fab Five era or the 89 NC unis, but these are nice. Agreed with everyone above that we need to keep the Maize unis in the fold. All in all Adidas has done well with the new gear. The football jerseys look pretty sharp and the new hockey jerseys are awesome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BenAA</title>
		<link>http://www.umhoops.com/2008/09/30/adidas-uniforms/comment-page-1/#comment-6261</link>
		<dc:creator>BenAA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 15:38:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umhoops.com/?p=440#comment-6261</guid>
		<description>The second photo appears to be camera-phone quality.

And, I agree with Dylan, there is a sheen on the letters and numbers.  Its subtle, but I -think- I like it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The second photo appears to be camera-phone quality.</p>
<p>And, I agree with Dylan, there is a sheen on the letters and numbers.  Its subtle, but I -think- I like it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
