Comments on: Thursday Bullets http://www.umhoops.com/2008/04/10/thursday-bullets-2/ An Unofficial University of Michigan Basketball Blog Tue, 16 Mar 2010 23:48:28 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Dylan http://www.umhoops.com/2008/04/10/thursday-bullets-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1449 Dylan Fri, 11 Apr 2008 17:31:22 +0000 http://www.umhoops.com/?p=242#comment-1449 He emailed me about it. He emailed me about it.

]]> By: Benjamin http://www.umhoops.com/2008/04/10/thursday-bullets-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1448 Benjamin Fri, 11 Apr 2008 17:11:25 +0000 http://www.umhoops.com/?p=242#comment-1448 Did you contact Lacy about the error or did he contact you? Did you contact Lacy about the error or did he contact you?

]]> By: Al Horford http://www.umhoops.com/2008/04/10/thursday-bullets-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1443 Al Horford Thu, 10 Apr 2008 19:45:01 +0000 http://www.umhoops.com/?p=242#comment-1443 excellent point excellent point

]]> By: Dylan http://www.umhoops.com/2008/04/10/thursday-bullets-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1442 Dylan Thu, 10 Apr 2008 18:55:48 +0000 http://www.umhoops.com/?p=242#comment-1442 Guys Lacy just sent me an email, he's getting the "incoming recruit" part of the article fixed. An editor or someone put it in by accident I guess. Someone must have got confused because the article is about recruiting put Peedi wasn't a recruit. Guys Lacy just sent me an email, he’s getting the “incoming recruit” part of the article fixed. An editor or someone put it in by accident I guess. Someone must have got confused because the article is about recruiting put Peedi wasn’t a recruit.

]]> By: Kevin In GR http://www.umhoops.com/2008/04/10/thursday-bullets-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1441 Kevin In GR Thu, 10 Apr 2008 17:29:04 +0000 http://www.umhoops.com/?p=242#comment-1441 Good catch! I thought maybe you could read it as "incoming recruit" to Beilein's system/team, but you can't really do that. You are right....It does make you wonder about other "facts" in the article being true or not. Good catch! I thought maybe you could read it as “incoming recruit” to Beilein’s system/team, but you can’t really do that. You are right….It does make you wonder about other “facts” in the article being true or not.

]]> By: UMbballDC http://www.umhoops.com/2008/04/10/thursday-bullets-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1440 UMbballDC Thu, 10 Apr 2008 17:13:28 +0000 http://www.umhoops.com/?p=242#comment-1440 Does it hurt Lacy's credibility when the very first sentence of his article starts talking about "incoming recruit DeShawn Sims," and the Beilein hiring. Sims was not an incoming recruit when Beilein was hired. Does he mean Manny? Does this guy have a clue? Please, someone help me, because I grade college freshmen's papers all the time and if the first sentence of their paper is factually incorrect, I take a very dim view of the paper and they tend to get a bad grade! I certainly have little reason to trust other "facts" they may present later in the paper. Does it hurt Lacy’s credibility when the very first sentence of his article starts talking about “incoming recruit DeShawn Sims,” and the Beilein hiring. Sims was not an incoming recruit when Beilein was hired. Does he mean Manny? Does this guy have a clue?

Please, someone help me, because I grade college freshmen’s papers all the time and if the first sentence of their paper is factually incorrect, I take a very dim view of the paper and they tend to get a bad grade! I certainly have little reason to trust other “facts” they may present later in the paper.

]]>