<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Game 24: Michigan @ Minnesota: Post Game</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.umhoops.com/2008/02/22/game-24-michigan-minnesota-post-game/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.umhoops.com/2008/02/22/game-24-michigan-minnesota-post-game/</link>
	<description>Michigan Basketball News, Recruiting, and Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 03:53:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dylan</title>
		<link>http://www.umhoops.com/2008/02/22/game-24-michigan-minnesota-post-game/comment-page-1/#comment-5868</link>
		<dc:creator>Dylan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 18:43:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umhoops.com/2008/02/22/game-24-michigan-minnesota-post-game/#comment-5868</guid>
		<description>Back to back wins at home are a must. And I think we will get them. I am excited to hear what Jalen has to say as well at halftime.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back to back wins at home are a must. And I think we will get them. I am excited to hear what Jalen has to say as well at halftime.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NVE</title>
		<link>http://www.umhoops.com/2008/02/22/game-24-michigan-minnesota-post-game/comment-page-1/#comment-5867</link>
		<dc:creator>NVE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 17:31:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umhoops.com/2008/02/22/game-24-michigan-minnesota-post-game/#comment-5867</guid>
		<description>There are so many downers about this game, and you guys have covered them well.  I just wanted to hearken back to that sweet stretch of 25 minutes when this team played so well.

Manny driving with a controlled aggressiveness, both hitting little runners and getting to the rim.  Kelvin running the offense with patience.  Ekpe providing boundless energy. Everyone hitting the offensive glass relentlessly.  Locking down on McKenzie defensively, thereby castrating Minnesota&#039;s offense for a stretch.

It&#039;s hard to see this team move away from this  type of smart hoop within a game.  When they maintain this level of play for 40 minutes, they&#039;ve won like they did vs. OSU.  When they play this way for 30 minutes, they&#039;ll lose close games like UCLA, @ Wisconsin, @ Minnesota, @ Purdue, etc.

After that first half against Iowa, the team felt totally lost.  As Dylan put it, you really started to wonder if we&#039;d ever be decent again.  But whatever clicked at halftime in Iowa City is still showing through.

I expect back to back wins at home this week, and more of the good from the Minnesota game than the bad.  Let&#039;s get the Illini on Saturday.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are so many downers about this game, and you guys have covered them well.  I just wanted to hearken back to that sweet stretch of 25 minutes when this team played so well.</p>
<p>Manny driving with a controlled aggressiveness, both hitting little runners and getting to the rim.  Kelvin running the offense with patience.  Ekpe providing boundless energy. Everyone hitting the offensive glass relentlessly.  Locking down on McKenzie defensively, thereby castrating Minnesota&#8217;s offense for a stretch.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s hard to see this team move away from this  type of smart hoop within a game.  When they maintain this level of play for 40 minutes, they&#8217;ve won like they did vs. OSU.  When they play this way for 30 minutes, they&#8217;ll lose close games like UCLA, @ Wisconsin, @ Minnesota, @ Purdue, etc.</p>
<p>After that first half against Iowa, the team felt totally lost.  As Dylan put it, you really started to wonder if we&#8217;d ever be decent again.  But whatever clicked at halftime in Iowa City is still showing through.</p>
<p>I expect back to back wins at home this week, and more of the good from the Minnesota game than the bad.  Let&#8217;s get the Illini on Saturday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AC</title>
		<link>http://www.umhoops.com/2008/02/22/game-24-michigan-minnesota-post-game/comment-page-1/#comment-5866</link>
		<dc:creator>AC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 15:31:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umhoops.com/2008/02/22/game-24-michigan-minnesota-post-game/#comment-5866</guid>
		<description>They lost because their three best offensive players (Harris, Sims, Wright) were bad - at least late in the game.  You can&#039;t go 5-26 with threes and win a game....period.

That being said, while I like Zach Gibson there is no reason he should shoot 5 threes in a game.  And he DEFINITELY shouldn&#039;t take one early in the shot clock.  I realize his shooting could spread the D, but he got out of hand last night.  In 11 minutes our center took 5 threes?

I also realized last night just how worthless Ron Coleman is.  I&#039;m not sure if he doesn&#039;t understand his role, but he&#039;s just bad.  He misses an open three, loses a rebound, gets schooled on D, doesn&#039;t ever go into the paint.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They lost because their three best offensive players (Harris, Sims, Wright) were bad &#8211; at least late in the game.  You can&#8217;t go 5-26 with threes and win a game&#8230;.period.</p>
<p>That being said, while I like Zach Gibson there is no reason he should shoot 5 threes in a game.  And he DEFINITELY shouldn&#8217;t take one early in the shot clock.  I realize his shooting could spread the D, but he got out of hand last night.  In 11 minutes our center took 5 threes?</p>
<p>I also realized last night just how worthless Ron Coleman is.  I&#8217;m not sure if he doesn&#8217;t understand his role, but he&#8217;s just bad.  He misses an open three, loses a rebound, gets schooled on D, doesn&#8217;t ever go into the paint.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UMbballDC</title>
		<link>http://www.umhoops.com/2008/02/22/game-24-michigan-minnesota-post-game/comment-page-1/#comment-5865</link>
		<dc:creator>UMbballDC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 15:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.umhoops.com/2008/02/22/game-24-michigan-minnesota-post-game/#comment-5865</guid>
		<description>I would have to agree.  But with my rose colored glasses firmly in place, even when they looked bad at the end, I don&#039;t think that they looked as bad as they did earlier in the season.

Bad shot selection all around.  I love Ekpe, but he should not be shooting the ball from more than 5 feet away from the basket.  Sims missed a wide open three and Wright was just plain bad all game.

You have to believe that in the coming years, all the drives Manny misses will start going down.  At which point he will be a man among boys.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would have to agree.  But with my rose colored glasses firmly in place, even when they looked bad at the end, I don&#8217;t think that they looked as bad as they did earlier in the season.</p>
<p>Bad shot selection all around.  I love Ekpe, but he should not be shooting the ball from more than 5 feet away from the basket.  Sims missed a wide open three and Wright was just plain bad all game.</p>
<p>You have to believe that in the coming years, all the drives Manny misses will start going down.  At which point he will be a man among boys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

